Content » Vol 39, Issue 9

Original report

Practice Style Traits: Do they help explain practice behaviours of stroke rehabilitation professionals?

Nicol Korner-Bitensky, Anita Menon-Nair, Aliki Thomas, Elizabeth Boutin and Alaa Mohammad Arafah
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0106

Abstract

Rationale: The gap in knowledge translation from research to clinical practice is under scrutiny in stroke rehabilitation. One possible reason for this gap may be a poor understanding of clinicians’ practice style traits and how they influence practice behaviours.
Objectives: To identify the prevalence of practice style traits in physical therapists and occupational therapists working in stroke rehabilitation and, to explore associations between these traits and practice behaviours, where practice behaviours are defined as the clinicians’ reasons for choosing assessments and interventions used in practice. The influence of more traditional personal and organizational factors on practice behaviours was also explored.
Design: Cross-sectional survey of a representative random sample of 243 clinicians (117 occupational therapists and 126 physical therapists) working across the continuum of stroke care in Ontario, Canada.
Methods: A telephone-administered validated clinical practice survey elicited information in 4 areas: practice style traits using the validated Practice Style Questionnaire, therapists’ reasons for choosing assessments and interventions (practice behaviours), personal factors and organizational factors.
Results: For both disciplines, the most prevalent trait was pragmatist and the least prevalent was seeker. Seekers were the most likely to use evidence-based reasons for choosing assessments, but this finding did not reach significance (χ2 = 5.430, df = 3; p = 0.14). The most typical reason for choosing an intervention was that the clinician had learned it during professional training, an interesting finding given that approximately half of clinicians had more than 10 years of experience. Of the 21 potential explanatory variables examined, few explained clinicians’ reasons for choosing assessments or interventions.
Conclusion: While understanding practice traits is not going to be the single solution to closing the knowledge translation gap, it may help to guide best practice implementation strategies.

Lay Abstract

Comments

Do you want to comment on this paper? The comments will show up here and if appropriate the comments will also separately be forwarded to the authors. You need to login/create an account to comment on articles. Click here to login/create an account.
Advertisement