Content » Vol 51, Issue 8

Original report

COMMON CONTENT BETWEEN QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRES FOR CHILDREN WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS AND THE INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH

Danielle Cristina Gomes, MSc1, Egmar Longo, PT, MSc, PhD1, Olaf Kraus de Camargo, MD, MSc, FRCPC2, Diego de Sousa Dantas, PT, MSc, PhD1, Haryelle Náryma Confessor Ferreira, MSc1, Isabelly Cristina Rodrigues Regalado, MSc3, Luciana Castaneda Ribeiro, PT, MSc, PhD4 and Silvana Alves Pereira, PT, MSc, PhD1,3

From the 1Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences of Trairi, Federal University of Rio Grande do, FACISA/UFRN, Santa Cruz, 2Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, Hamilton, 3Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN, Natal, and 4Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: To identify the most common quality of life instruments for children with cystic fibrosis and link the content with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Methods: The study was conducted in 2 stages. The first stage involved a review of the literature to select quality of life questionnaires. In the second stage 2 independent reviewers identified questionnaire items and categories corresponding to the ICF, according to approved methodology. The degree of agreement was calculated using the kappa coefficient.

Results: Two questionnaires were selected: the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire and DISABKIDS®. A total of 130 concepts were identified from the 112 items. Forty-seven different ICF categories were linked (k>0.62 for all questionnaires), 21 (44.7%) were related to the “body function” domain, 20 (42.6%) to “activity and participation” and 6 (12.8%) to “environmental factors”. Thirteen items (10%) could not be linked because they represent personal factors or are not covered by the ICF.

Conclusion: Body functions were the category most linked to the ICF. Environmental factors were poorly described, and no items were related to body structures in any of the instruments.

Key words: cystic fibrosis; child; quality of life; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Accepted May 23, 2019; Epub ahead of print Jun 10, 2019

J Rehabil Med 2019; 51: 00–00

Correspondence address: Silvana Alves Pereira, Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, BR 101, Natal, RN, Brazil. E-mail: apsilvana@ccs.ufrn.br

Lay Abstract

Cystic fibrosis imposes a heavy treatment burden on the quality of life and psychological well-being of children. Since much of the daily management of cystic fibrosis occurs at home, observing the child’s ability to participate in school-based and leisure activities is of paramount importance, as participation in these activities is considered essential for child development, in addition to contributing to health-related quality of life. This study identified the quality of life questionnaires for cystic fibrosis and linked their items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). In the 2 questionnaires presented here, the categories primarily represented body functions and, al-though environmental factors play an important role in children’s participation in home, school and community activities, and can act as a support or barrier, they were the categories least covered by the 2 questionnaires and no items were related to body structures in any of the instruments.

Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF), a chronic progressive condition that involves several systems, leads to numerous clinical manifestations, the most common being pancreatic insufficiency and pulmonary alterations with chronic airway infection. These alterations impose a heavy treatment burden on the quality of life and psychological well-being of individuals with CF (1–3).

In recent years, several instruments have been developed to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (3–6). The HRQoL indicator provides information on the impact of a disease and its treatment in different life situa-tions, which are measured by specific or generic questionnaires aimed at assessing the individual in terms of physical, emotional and social impacts. However, these instruments may focus differently on the components of functionality and health, and analysing their scope could result in better clinical practice applications (7, 8).

In recent years, numerous studies on the breadth of HRQoL instruments have proposed using the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) to provide relevant information on how they can be used in the assessment, planning and care of children with CF (7–10). This is because the ICF is used to monitor the functionality of individuals and populations on a broader scale in order to consider the health and biopsychosocial aspects involved in the health-disease process. It includes a number of categories describing aspects of human functionality that interfere with daily activities, as well as environmental factors that may be facilitators or barriers (9).

The common content between ICF and generic instruments that evaluate HRQoL in children has already been identified (7, 8), but the points of convergence and/or divergence between questionnaires in order to assess the biopsychosocial impacts of CF and ICF have yet to be established. As such, the objectives of this study were to identify the main HRQoL questionnaires specifically designed for children with CF and to examine how their content is represented in the ICF categories.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 2 stages. The first stage involved a review of the literature to identify and select specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaires for children with CF, and the second consisted of linking the items of the questionnaires to the ICF according to the methodology proposed by Cieza et al. (11).

The first step was performed on the PubMed, SciELO and LILACS electronic databases in June 2017 using the descriptors Quality of Life Questionnaires AND Cystic Fibrosis AND Child. The search found 176 studies in English, Portuguese and Spanish between 1980 and 2017, sorted by title and abstract. In the studies that evaluated the QoL of children with CF, we sought to identify the most commonly used instruments in the literature. Two questionnaires were selected: the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ) and DISABKIDS® – Cystic Fibrosis Module (DISABKIDS® – CFM). The former, which has been translated and validated in different languages (4, 12–14), is widely used in the literature and evaluates individuals from childhood to adulthood through 4 versions: CFQ6–11, CFQ12–13, CFQ14+ and CFQparents6–13. Based on the criteria of the present study, the CFQ6–11 and CFQparents6–13 versions, which contain 35 and 44 questions, respectively, were included in addition to the demographic sections.

The DISABKIDS® – CFM is 1 of 7 modules developed by the DISABKIDS group for specific health conditions. This short 10-item questionnaire is divided into 2 scales (impact and treatment). The former (4 items) describes the feelings of tiredness and exhaustion, and the latter (6 items) the emotional impact of the treatment. There is a version for children and adolescents from 8 to 18 years (DISABKIDSself) and another, with parallel items, for parents or caregivers (DISABKIDSproxy).

In the second stage of the study, the methodology used to link the QoL instruments to the ICF (9) was based on the rules proposed by Cieza et al., in 2002 (15). This methodology has been updated twice (11, 16) and is widely disseminated in the literature. The link between the items of the QoL instruments and the ICF was determined by 2 independent physical therapists with theoretical knowledge and previous practical ICF experience in health services. In case of disagreement, a third senior physical therapist with broad ICF experience was consulted in order to reach a consensus.

Absolute and relative frequencies were used in descriptive statistical analysis. The degree of agreement between the 2 professionals who established the link between the items and the ICF was calculated using the kappa coefficient, and the classification suggested by Landis & Koch (17), in which values less than zero are poor, between 0 and 0.2 slight, between 0.21 and 0.4 fair, between 0.41 and 0.6 moderate, between 0.61 and 0.8 substantial and between 0.81 and 1.0 almost perfect. In all analyses, a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20.0 were used.

RESULTS

A total of 130 concepts were identified from the 112 items and 47 different ICF categories were linked (QFC6–11 k=0.646; CFQparents6–13 k=0.670; DISABKIDSself and DISABKIDSproxy k=0.622).

Twenty-one (44.7%) concepts were related to the body function domain, 20 (42.6%) to the activity and participation domain, and 6 (12.8%) to environmental factors. Thirteen items (10%) could not be linked to the ICF because they represent personal factors or are not covered by the ICF. All of these unrelated items were contained in the CFQ – Revised (CFQparents6–13 and CFQ6–11) (Fig. 1).


Fig. 1. Distribution of the content of the questionnaires in relation to the domains of the ICF. (b) body function; (d) Activity and participation; (e) environmental factors; Pf: personal factors; nc: not covered; CFQ: Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire

The absolute and relative frequencies of the categories identified in the questionnaires are presented in Table I, and divided by ICF domains, chapters, and categories.


Table I. Absolute and relative frequency of the categories identified in the questionnaires by component and chapter of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

The absolute and relative frequencies of the categories identified in the questionnaires are presented in Table I, and divided by ICF domains, chapters, and categories.

Half (15) of CFQparents6–13 categories were related to body function (b), 40% (12) to activities and participation (d) and 10% (3) to environmental factors (e). Four of the 8 body function domain chapters were linked to these items, the most cited was (b1) – mental functions, and the most detailed categories were the 4-level categories b1522 – range of emotion and b1801 – body image.

However, most of the linked categories in CFQ6–11 were related to the activities and participation domain (14 = 51.3%), body function domain (9 = 33.3%) and environmental factors (4 = 14.3%). Six of the 9 activities and participation domain chapters were represented in the linked categories, chapter d4 (mobility) and categories d4551 (climbing) and d920 (recreation and leisure) being the most cited.

Only 9 of the 47 categories identified were linked to the items of DISABKIDS® (DISABKIDSself and DISABKIDSproxy version), most pertaining to the body function domain (5 = 55.6%) in both versions, representing 2 of the 8 chapters that make up this domain, namely (b1) – mental functions, with category b152 (emotional functions) being the most cited; and (b4) – functions of the cardiovascular, haematological, immunological and respiratory systems. Category frequency was 22.2% (2) in the activities and participation and environmental factors domains in both versions of the questionnaires.

DISCUSSION

Comparing HRQoL measures with the ICF may reveal its uniqueness, demonstrating the nature and scope of its content. In most cases, instruments focus on different aspects of ICF domains, with “body functions” and “activities and participation” components usually predominating (7, 8). In the 4 versions presented here (CFQparents6–13; CFQ6–11; DISABKIDSself; and DISABKIDSproxy), the categories primarily represented body functions, except for the CFQ6–11, version, where the activities and participation component was the most frequent. By contrast, environmental factors were poorly described, and none of the categories were related to body structures.

Although chapters b1 to b5 have been linked to the items identified, the only chapters that contained categories cited in all 4 versions were Mental functions (b1) and Functions of the cardiovascular, haematological, immunological and respiratory systems (b4). Category b152 (emotional functions) has often been linked in the different instruments (20 times), because a number of feelings/sensations, including “happy”, “worried”, “angry”, “annoyed”, “sad”, “upset”, and “bothered”, were represented in this category. The high attachment index of this category to different feelings has been addressed in other studies (8, 18).

Because of the clinical manifestations present in the scope of body functions resulting from the multisystemic nature of CF, the questionnaires can be used to address a large number of aspects related to this domain (7, 8, 19). Studies that seek to identify clinical factors associated with HRQoL in individuals with CF have concluded that variables assessing exacerbation and pulmonary function have the greatest impact on HRQoL (4, 20, 21). Multidirectional relationships between ICF domains demonstrate that body functions are only 1 aspect for practitioners to consider. Other domains should also be incorporated (22).

The complex treatment these children are subjected to, including ingested and inhaled medication, nebulization, antibiotics, pancreatic enzymes, nutritional supplements, respiratory physical therapy techniques, and hospitalization, is time-consuming and a burdensome daily routine (3, 13). These factors, together with body function limitations, may interfere with the performance of daily activities and community participation.

The CFQ6–11 was the only instrument where most items were related to the activities and participation domain, although the categories linked CFQparents6–13 to chapters d1 (learning and applying knowledge) and d2 (general tasks and demands), a finding not observed in the children’s version. The most representative chapters were d4 (mobility) and d9 (community, social and civic life), the latter addressed in all the questionnaires, and d920 (recreation and leisure) the most frequent category. Since much of the daily management of CF occurs at home, observing the child’s ability to perform age-appropriate activities, and participate in typical school-based and leisure activities is of paramount importance, since participation in the activities of daily living is considered essential to child development, in addition to contributing to HRQoL, and is the ultimate goal of rehabilitation programmes (22–24).

Environmental factors play an important role in children’s participation in home, school and community activities, and can act as a support or barrier (25). Despite their relevance, environmental factors were the categories least covered by the 4 versions. In this component, the most cited category was e5800 (health services).

Other categories addressed in this component were education and training services (e5850); acquaintances, peers, colleagues, neighbours and community members (e325); societal attitudes (e460); individual attitudes of acquaintances, peers, colleagues, neighbours and community members (e425); and drugs (e1101).

According to the model presented by the ICF, the functionality of an individual with a specific health condition depends on body-related aspects, as well as personal and environmental factors (9). The weakness of the instruments in failing to sufficiently address these factors limits an extended evaluation, as proposed by the ICF, and makes it difficult to identify possible facilitators or barriers that the environment imposes on children with CF and their impact on QoL, in addition to showing the need to refine paediatric HRQoL instruments. This recurrent weakness has been demonstrated in other studies (7, 8).

In the context faced by children with CF, categories such as: e310 (immediate family); e355 (health professionals); e410 (individual attitudes of immediate family members); and e450 (individual attitudes of health professionals) could have been addressed. The environment, access to healthcare and drugs, and support from the spouse, family, friends, teachers, classmates and colleagues are important aspects that influence the HRQoL reported by individuals with CF (26).

All items that could not be linked to the ICF belonged to the CFQ – Revised versions, most of which referred to personal factors contained in the demographic sections that make up these instruments. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and other factors seem to have an impact on HRQoL (27–29). Identifying these factors in the linking process may reveal a number of relevant personal factors to add to the ICF if classification of personal factors is desired in the future (18, 30). The items classified as not covered (nc) were contained only in the CFQparents6–13 version, exhibiting comprehensive content, including “my child leads a normal life” (item 24), and “my child has a feeding problem” (item 44), or very specific items such as “my child’s phlegm has been predominant” (item 37).

This study sought to link the items of 2 specific instruments that evaluate the HRQoL of children with CF. The included questionnaires display good psychometric properties. DISABKIDS® contains few items, thereby optimizing application and assessment time; however, more than half of its items are linked to body function categories. The versions of the CFQ were linked to a larger number of categories that addressed the 4 ICF domains. The CFQ6–11 was the only version in which the activity and participation domain exhibited the highest frequency, but did not address some of the chapters related to the functions of the digestive, metabolic and endocrine systems (b5), learning and applying knowledge (d1), and general tasks and demands (d2) that were covered in the parents’ version. Thus, we suggest the simultaneous use of the CFQ6–11 and CFQparents6–13 questionnaires.

In conclusion, the main HRQoL questionnaires specifically designed for children with CF were CFQ and DISABKIDS®. The link between the items of the instruments and the ICF domains made it possible to acquire information on the scope of the human functionality components in each questionnaire. More than half of the content of the DISABKIDS® (DISABKIDSself and DISABKIDSproxy) is linked to the categories related to body function. The CFQ versions (CFQparents6–13; CFQ6–11) were linked to a larger number of categories that reached the 4 domains that make up the ICF, namely body function (b), body structures (s), activities and participation (d), and environmental factors (e), allowing a broader assessment of health status. However, both questionnaires (CFQ and DISABKIDS®) exhibit disadvantages in relation to the biopsychosocial evaluation proposed by ICF, since they barely address factors of the physical, social and attitudinal environment in the HRQoL assessment process of children with CF.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) Finance Code 001 and Postgraduate School from Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.

REFERENCES
  1. Borawska-Kowalczyk U, Sands D. Determinants of health-related quality of life in polish patients with CF – adolescents’ and parents’ perspectives. Dev Period Med 2015; 19: 127–136.
    View article    Google Scholar
  2. Jamieson N, Fitzgerald D, Singh-Grewal D, Hanson CS, Craig JC, Tong A. Children’s experiences of cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Pediatrics 2014; 133: S1683–1697.
    View article    Google Scholar
  3. Michielsen A, van Wijk I, Ketelaar M. Participation and health-related quality of life of Dutch children and adolescents with congenital lower limb deficiencies. J Rehabil Med 2011 43: 584–589.
    View article    Google Scholar
  4. Quittner AL, Buu A, Messer MA, Modi AC, Watrous M. Development and validation of The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire in the United States: a health-related quality-of-life measure for cystic fibrosis. Chest 2005; 128: 2347–2354.
    View article    Google Scholar
  5. Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L, Erhart M, Bruil J, Duer W, et al. KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2005; 5: 353–364.
    View article    Google Scholar
  6. Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care 1999; 37: 126–139.
    View article    Google Scholar
  7. Gandhi PK, Thompson LA, Tuli SY, Revicki DA, Shenkman E, Huang IC. Developing item banks for measuring pediatric generic health-related quality of life: an application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth and item response theory. PLoS One 2014; 9: S107771.
    View article    Google Scholar
  8. Petersson C, Simeonsson RJ, Enskar K, Huus K. Comparing children’s self-report instruments for health-related quality of life using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 75.
    View article    Google Scholar
  9. World Health Organization WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. ICF browser 2017 – English version. Available from: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    View article    Google Scholar
  10. Schiariti V, Fayed N, Cieza A, Klassen A, O’Donnell M. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures for cerebral palsy based on the International Classification of Functioning. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 1330-1339.
    View article    Google Scholar
  11. Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, Prodinger B. Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 574–583.
    View article    Google Scholar
  12. Henry B, Aussage P, Grosskopf C, Goehrs JM. Development of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ) for assessing quality of life in pediatric and adult patients. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 63–76.
    View article    Google Scholar
  13. Rozov T, Cunha MT, Nascimento O, Quittner AL, Jardim JR. Linguistic validation of cystic fibrosis quality of life questionnaires. J Pediatr 2006; 82: 151–156.
    View article    Google Scholar
  14. Schmidt A, Wenninger K, Niemann N, Wahn U, Staab D. Health-related quality of life in children with cystic fibrosis: validation of the German CFQ-R. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7: 97.
    View article    Google Scholar
  15. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health–status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 205–210.
    View article    Google Scholar
  16. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 212–218.
    View article    Google Scholar
  17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.
    View article    Google Scholar
  18. Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1225–1237.
    View article    Google Scholar
  19. Fava L, Muehlan H, Bullinger M. Linking the DISABKIDS modules for health-related quality of life assessment with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2009; 23: 1943–1954.
    View article    Google Scholar
  20. Habib AR, Manji J, Wilcox PG, Javer AR, Buxton JA, Quon BS. A systematic review of factors associated with health-related quality of life in adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12: 420–428.
    View article    Google Scholar
  21. Nathan AM, de Bruyne JA, Eg KP, Thavagnanam S. Review: quality of life in children with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Front Pediatr 2017; 5: 84.
    View article    Google Scholar
  22. Mandrusiak A, MacDonald J, Watter P. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an effective model for describing young people with cystic fibrosis. Child Care Health Dev 2009; 35: 2–4.
    View article    Google Scholar
  23. Coster W, Law M, Bedell G, Khetani M, Cousins M, Teplicky R. Development of the participation and environment measure for children and youth: conceptual basis. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34: 238-246.
    View article    Google Scholar
  24. King G, Law M, King S, Rosenbaum P, Kertoy MK, Young NL. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2003; 23: 63–90.
    View article    Google Scholar
  25. Kang LJ, Hsieh MC, Liao HF, Hwang AW. Environmental barriers to participation of preschool children with and without physical disabilities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14: 518.
    View article    Google Scholar
  26. Bredemeier J, Gomes WB. Perception of quality of life of persons with cystic fibrosis: a study on the adequacy of rating scales. Rev Psiquiatr RS 2007; 29: 35–43.
    View article    Google Scholar
  27. Bodnar R, Kadar L, Holics K, Ujhelyi R, Kovacs L, Bolbas K, et al. Factors influencing quality of life and disease severity in Hungarian children and young adults with cystic fibrosis. Ital J Pediatr 2014; 40: 1.
    View article    Google Scholar
  28. Quittner AL, Sawicki GS, McMullen A, Rasouliyan L, Pasta DJ, Yegin A, et al. Erratum to: Psychometric evaluation of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire–Revised in a national, US sample. Qual Life Res 2012; 2: 1279–1290.
    View article    Google Scholar
  29. van Horck M, Winkens B, Wesseling G, de Winter-de Groot K, de Vreede I, Jobsis Q, et al. Factors associated with changes in health-related quality of life in children with cystic fibrosis during 1-year follow-up. Eur J Pediatr 2017; 176: 1047–1054.
    View article    Google Scholar
  30. Geyh S, Schwegler U, Peter C, Müller R. Representing and organizing information to describe the lived experience of health from a personal factors perspective in the light of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): a discussion paper. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 1727–1738.
    View article    Google Scholar

Comments

Do you want to comment on this paper? The comments will show up here and if appropriate the comments will also separately be forwarded to the authors. You need to login/create an account to comment on articles. Click here to login/create an account.