External validation of approaches to prediction of falls during hospital rehabilitation stays and development of a new simpler tool
Angela Vratsistas-Curto, Anne Tiedemann, Daniel Treacy, Stephen R. Lord, Cathie Sherrington
Musculoskeletal Health Sydney, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, 2000 Sydney, Australia. E-mail: email@example.com
Objectives: To test the external validity of 4 approaches to fall prediction in a rehabilitation setting (Predict_FIRST, Ontario Modified STRATIFY (OMS), physiotherapists’ judgement of fall risk (PT_Risk), and falls in the past year (Past_Falls)), and to develop and test the validity of a simpler tool for fall prediction in rehabilitation (Predict_CM2).
Participants: A total of 300 consecutively-admitted rehabilitation inpatients.
Methods: Prospective inception cohort study. Falls during the rehabilitation stay were monitored. Potential predictors were extracted from medical records.
Results: Forty-one patients (14%) fell during their rehabilitation stay. The external validity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), for predicting future fallers was: 0.71 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.61–0.81) for OMS (Total_Score); 0.66 (95% CI: 0.57–0.74) for Predict_FIRST; 0.65 (95% CI 0.57–0.73) for PT_Risk; and 0.52 for Past_Falls (95% CI: 0.46–0.60). A simple 3-item tool (Predict_CM2) was developed from the most predictive individual items (impaired mobility/transfer ability, impaired cognition, and male sex). The accuracy of Predict_CM2 was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66–0.81), comparable to OMS (Total_Score) (p = 0.52), significantly better than Predict_FIRST (p = 0.04), and Past_Falls (p < 0.001), and approaching significantly better than PT_Risk (p = 0.09).
Conclusion: Predict_CM2 is a simpler screening tool with similar accuracy for predicting fallers in rehabilitation to OMS (Total_Score) and better accuracy than Predict_FIRST or Past_Falls. External validation of Predict_CM2 is required.
Predicting which patients are most likely to fall can be difficult for health staff working in a hospital rehabilitation ward. We studied the accuracy of four different approaches to predicting falls in rehabilitation (the Predict_FIRST screening tool, the Ontario Modified STRATIFY screening tool, physiotherapists’ judgement of fall risk and a single question about falls in past year). We also developed and proposed a simpler screening tool which we named the Predict_CM2. We tested the four approaches and developed the new tool using data from 300 patients admitted to a rehabilitation ward. We found that Predict_CM2 had similar accuracy to the Ontario Modified STRATIFY tool and better accuracy than the Predict_FIRST tool or a single question about falls in past year at predicting falls. We concluded that the Predict_CM2 can be used for predicting falls in rehabilitation and recommended it be tested in other rehabilitation settings.
Do you want to comment on this paper? The comments will show up here and if appropriate the comments will also separately be forwarded to the authors.
You need to login/create an account to comment on articles. Click here to login/create an account