Content » Vol 41, Issue 12

Original report

Robot therapy for functional recovery of the upper limbs: A pilot study on patients after stroke

Federica Bovolenta, Milena Goldoni, Pierina Clerici, Maurizio Agosti, Marco Franceschini
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0402

Abstract

Objective: To verify the possibility of administering robot-aided therapy for the upper limbs in patients after stroke; to evaluate patients’ degree of acceptance and compliance with the treatment; to establish if the treatment has an effect on motor impairment and functional outcome.
Design: Quasi-experimental, uncontrolled study.
Subjects: Fourteen patients with chronic hemiparesis after stroke.
Methods: Patients were treated with a robotic system for the upper limbs (ReoGoTM; Motorika Medical Ltd, Israel). Subjects performed the following assessment, at the start (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), and at the follow-up performed one month after the end of treatment (T2): Fugl-Meyer test (FM) for upper limbs; strength evaluation; Ashworth scale; visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain; Frenchay Arm test (FAT); Box and Block test (B&B); Functional Independence Measure (FIMTM); ABILHAND Questionnaire; Timed Up and Go test (TUG); Euro-Quality of Life questionnaire and; a VAS for treatment satisfaction were administered to the subjects.
Results: Total scores of FM, B&B, FAT and FIMTM showed a statistically significant improvement from T0 and T1 (FM p < 0.002, B&B p < 0.012, FAT p < 0.023, FIMTM p < 0.007) and from T0 and T2 (FM p < 0.003, B&B p <  0.011, FAT p < 0.024, FIM p < 0.027). No statistically significant differences were found between evaluations at T1 and T2 (FM p < 0.595, B&B p < 0.491, FAT p < 0.317, FIM p < 0.180).
Conclusion: The sample was capable of completing the treatment and demonstrated good participant satisfaction. This pilot study led to the finding of a clinical improvement and excellent patient compliance. It can be hypothesized that the results are robot-dependent and that they were learned and then maintained. However, the study is limited in that a control group was not used. As such, it is desirable to continue this study with a control group, as well as by designing a prospective longitudinal randomized controlled trial study.

Lay Abstract

Comments

Do you want to comment on this paper? The comments will show up here and if appropriate the comments will also separately be forwarded to the authors. You need to login/create an account to comment on articles. Click here to login/create an account.
Advertisement