Unilateral neglect: further validation of the baking tray task
            
                Peter Appelros  A1 A2, Gunnel M. Karlsson  A1, Annika Thorwalls  A3, Kerstin Tham  A2, Ingegerd Nydevik  A2 A3
                A1 Departments of Neurology and Geriatrics Örebro University Hospital Örebro
A2 Neurotec Department Karolinska Institutet Stockholm
A3 Stockholms Sjukhem Stockholm Sweden
                DOI: 10.1080/16501970410029852                
                                
   
            Abstract
            
                Objective: The Baking Tray Task is a comprehensible, simple-to-perform test for use in assessing unilateral neglect. The aim of this study was to validate further its use with stroke patients. Methods: The Baking Tray Task was compared with 2 versions of the Behaviour Inattention Test and a test for personal neglect. A total of 270 patients were subjected to a 3-item version of the Behaviour Inattention Test and 40 patients were subjected to an 8-item version of the Behaviour Inattention Test, besides the Baking Tray Task and the personal neglect test. Results: The Baking Tray Task was more sensitive than the 3-item Behaviour Inattention Test, but the 8-item Behaviour Inattention Test was more sensitive than the Baking Tray Task. The best combination of any 3 tests was Baking Tray Task, Reading an article, and Figure copying; the 2 last-mentioned being a part of the 8-item Behaviour Inattention Test. Conclusion: Multi-item tests detect more cases of neglect than do single tests. However, it is tiresome for the patient to undergo a larger test battery than necessary. It is also time-consuming for the staff. Behavioural tests seem more appropriate when assessing neglect. The Baking Tray Task seems to be one of the most sensitive single tests, but its sensitivity can be further enhanced when it is used in combination with other tests.              
            
                        Lay Abstract
            
                            
            
                        
            Comments
            
                
                               
                
                
  Do you want to comment on this paper? The comments will show up here and if appropriate the comments will also separately be forwarded to the authors. You need to login/create an account to comment on articles. Click here to 
login/create an account.