You are not logged in. Press here to login.

Content

List volumes - List articles in this issue

Original report

Goal attainment scaling: Does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury?

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0383

Open access

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare goal attainment scaling (GAS) and standardized measures in evaluation of person-centred outcomes in neurorehabilitation.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort analysis from a tertiary inpatient neuro-rehabilitation service for younger adults with complex neurological disability.
SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Consecutive patients (n = 164) admitted for rehabilitation following acquired brain injury (any cause) over 3 years. Mean age 44.8 (standard deviation 14.4) years. Diagnosis: 66% strokes, 18% trauma, 16% other. Male:female ratio 102:62.
METHODS: GAS-rated achievement of 1–6 patient-selected goals was compared with the Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM), and Barthel Index (BI), rated on admission and discharge. Personal goals were mapped retrospectively to the FIM+FAM and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
RESULTS: Median (interquartile range; IQR) GAS T-scores were 50.0 (44.2–51.8) and moderately correlated with changes in FIM+FAM and BI (both rho 0.38 (p < 0.001)). Standardized response means were 2.2, 1.6 and 1.4 for GAS, FIM+FAM and BI, respectively. Of 667 personal goals set, 495 (74%) were fully achieved. Although 413 (62%) goals were reflected by changes in FIM+FAM, over one-third of goals were set in other areas.
CONCLUSION: GAS appeared to be more responsive, and captured gains beyond the FIM+FAM, thus providing added value as an adjunct to outcome measurement in patients with complex disability.

Authors:

Lynne Turner-Stokes, Heather Williams, Jane Johnson

References

  1. Wade DT. Evidence relating to goal-planning in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 273–275.
  2. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65.
  3. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 566–573.
  4. Turner-Stokes L. Outcome measurement in brain injury rehabilitation – towards a common language. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 273–275.
  5. Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner-Stokes T, Gatehouse C. The UK FIM+FAM: development and evaluation. Functional Assessment Measure. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 277–287.
  6. Willer B, Button J, Rempel R. Residential and home-based postacute rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a case control study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 399–406.
  7. Hall KM, Mann N, High WMJ, Wright J, Kreutzer JS, Wood D. Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: Ceiling effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS, and CIQ. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1996; 11: 27–39.
  8. Hurn J, Kneebone I, Cropley M. Goal setting as an outcome measure: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 756–772.
  9. Kiresuk T, Sherman R. Goal attainment scaling: a general method of evaluating comprehensive mental health programmes. Com Mental Health J 1968; 4: 443–453.
  10. Rockwood K, Stolee P, Fox RA. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1113–1118.
  11. Schlosser RW. Goal attainment scaling as a clinical measurement technique in communication disorders: a critical review. J Commun Disord 2004; 37: 217–239.
  12. Malec JF, Smigielski JS, DePompolo RW. Goal attainment scaling and outcome measurement in postacute brain injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 138–143.
  13. Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Galama K, Gorter JW. Goal attainment scaling in paediatric rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 550–556.
  14. Shefler G, Canetti L, Wiseman H. Psychometric properties of goal-attainment scaling in the assessment of Mann’s time-limited psychotherapy. J Clin Psychol 2001; 57: 971–979.
  15. Palisano RJ. Validity of goal attainment scaling in infants with motor delays. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 651–658; discussion 658–660.
  16. Rockwood K, Howlett S, Stadnyk K, Carver D, Powell C, Stolee P. Responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 736–743.
  17. Mackay G, Somerville W. Reflections on goal attainment scaling. Educational Res 1996; 2: 161–171.
  18. Steenbeek D, Meester-Delver A, Becher JG, Lankhorst GJ. The effect of botulinum toxin type A treatment of the lower extremity on the level of functional abilities in children with cerebral palsy: evaluation with goal attainment scaling. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 274–282.
  19. Tennant A. Goal attainment scaling: current methodological challenges. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1583–1588.
  20. Yip AM, Gorman MC, Stadnyk K, Mills WG, MacPherson KM, Rockwood K. A standardized menu for Goal Attainment Scaling in the care of frail elders. Gerontologist 1998; 38: 735–742.
  21. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Report no.: ISBN 91 4 154542 9.
  22. Ashford S, Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment for spasticity management using botulinum toxin. Physiother Res Int 2006; 11: 24–34.
  23. Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation; a practical guide. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 362–370.
  24. Rockwood K, Joyce B, Stolee P. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in cognitive rehabilitation patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 581–588.
  25. Rushton PW, Miller WC. Goal attainment scaling in the rehabilitation of patients with lower-extremity amputations: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 771–775.
  26. Hawley CA, Taylor R, Hellawell DJ, Pentland B. Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1999; 67: 749–754.
  27. Nyein K, McMichael L, Turner-Stokes L. Can a FIM score be converted to a Barthel Index? Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 56–63.
  28. Collin C, Wade DT, Davis S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61–63.
  29. Gordon JE, Powell C, Rockwood K. Goal attainment scaling as a measure of clinically important change in nursing-home patients. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 275–281.
  30. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 205–210.
  31. Stucki G, Grimby G. Forward: Applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 5–6.
  32. Soberg HL, Finset A, Roise O, Bautz-Holter E. Identification and comparison of rehabilitation goals after multiple injuries: an ICF analysis of the patients’, physiotherapists’ and other allied professionals’ reported goals. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 340–346.
  33. Cohen J, editor. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  34. Kiresuk T, Smith A, Cardillo J, editors. Goal attainment scaling: application, theory and measurement. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.
  35. Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Freeman JA, Langdon DW, McLellan DL, Greenwood RJ, et al. Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurol 2001; 57: 639–644.
  36. Linn RT, Blair RS, Granger CV, Harper DW, O’Hara PA, Maciura E. Does the functional assessment measure (FAM) extend the functional independence measure (FIM) instrument? A Rasch analysis of stroke inpatients. J Outcome Meas 1999; 3: 339–359.
  37. Granger CV. A conceptual model for functional assessment. In: Granger CV & Gresham GE, editors. Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984.
  38. Schepers VP, Ketelaar M, van de Port IG, Visser-Meily JM, Lindeman E. Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 221–230.
  39. Boldt C, Brach M, Grill E, Berthou A, Meister K, Scheuringer M, et al. The ICF categories identified in nursing interventions administered to neurological patients with post-acute rehabilitation needs. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 431–436.
  40. Rauch A, Cieza A, Stucki G. How to apply the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for rehabilitation management in clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008; 44: 329–342.


Related articles

There are no related articles.


Actions


Abstract

Full text

PDF

Supplementary


There is no supplementary for this article.

Related articles


Click here to show related articles

Print information


Volume 41, Issue 7

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0383

Pages: 528-535

View at PubMed