You are not logged in. Press here to login.


List volumes - List articles in this issue

Original report

Pain responses in repeated end-range spinal movements and psychological factors in sick-listed patients with low back pain: Is there an association?

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0365

Open access


OBJECTIVE: Repeated end-range spinal movements producing specific pain responses (i.e. centralization or non-centralization) may be used for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. However, possible associations between psychological factors and pain responses have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between pain responses in repeated end-range spinal movement tests and psychological factors.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional clinical study.
Patients: Data from 331 patients sick-listed for 4–12 weeks due to low back pain with or without sciatica.
METHODS: Initially the patients completed a questionnaire including questions about psychological factors. Then they underwent a standardized physical test procedure and were classified according to centralized or non-centralized pain response.
RESULTS: Statistically significant associations were found between non-centralization and mental distress (p < 0.009) as well as depressive symptoms (p < 0.049). These associations remained present after adjustment for potential confounders by logistic regression: mental distress odds ratio (OR) 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.30) (p = 0.013), depressive symptoms OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.01–1.51) (p = 0.044).
CONCLUSION: The pain responses in repeated end-range spinal movements were not independent of psychological factors. Mental distress and depressive symptoms occurred more often among non-centralizers than among centralizers. It is recommended that the possible influence of psychological factors on the result of mechanical testing be accounted for in future studies.


David Christiansen , Kristian Larsen , Ole Kudsk Jensen , Claus Vinther Nielsen


  1. van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT, Hutchinson A, et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 Suppl 2: S169–S191.
  2. Waddell G, editor. The back pain revolution. Second edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
  3. Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP. A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine 2002; 27: E109–E120.
  4. Linton SJ. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. Spine 2000; 25: 1148–1156.
  5. Aina A, May S, Clare H. The centralization phenomenon of spinal symptoms – a systematic review. Man Ther 2004; 9: 134–143.
  6. McKenzie R, May S, editors. The lumbar spine: mechanical diagnosis and therapy. 2nd edn. Waikanae, New Zealand: Spinal Publications New Zealand Ltd; 2004.
  7. Donelson R, Silva G, Murphy K. Centralization phenomenon. Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred pain. Spine 1990; 15: 211–213.
  8. Laslett M, Oberg B, Aprill CN, McDonald B. Centralization as a predictor of provocation discography results in chronic low back pain, and the influence of disability and distress on diagnostic power. Spine J 2005; 5: 370–380.
  9. Long AL. The centralization phenomenon. Its usefulness as a predictor or outcome in conservative treatment of chronic low back pain (a pilot study). Spine 1995; 20: 2513–2520.
  10. Karas R, McIntosh G, Hall H, Wilson L, Melles T. The relationship between nonorganic signs and centralization of symptoms in the prediction of return to work for patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 354–360.
  11. Sufka A, Hauger B, Trenary M, Bishop B, Hagen A, Lozon R, et al. Centralization of low back pain and perceived functional outcome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27: 205–212.
  12. Werneke M, Hart DL, Cook D. A descriptive study of the centralization phenomenon. A prospective analysis. Spine 1999; 24: 676–683.
  13. Werneke M, Hart DL. Centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic low back pain and disability. Spine 2001; 26: 758–764.
  14. Skytte L, May S, Petersen P. Centralization: its prognostic value in patients with referred symptoms and sciatica. Spine 2005; 30: E293–E299.
  15. George SZ, Bialosky JE, Donald DA. The centralization phenomenon and fear-avoidance beliefs as prognostic factors for acute low back pain: a preliminary investigation involving patients classified for specific exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 580–588.
  16. Werneke MW, Hart DL, Resnik L, Stratford PW, Reyes A. Centralization: prevalence and effect on treatment outcomes using a standardized operational definition and measurement method. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008; 38: 116–125.
  17. Werneke MW, Hart DL. Centralization: association between repeated end-range pain responses and behavioral signs in patients with acute non-specific low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 286–290.
  18. Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 1980; 5: 117–125.
  19. Christensen KS, Fink P, Toft T, Frostholm L, Ornbol E, Olesen F. A brief case-finding questionnaire for common mental disorders: the CMDQ. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 448–457.
  20. Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2003; 19: 80–86.
  21. Boersma K, Linton SJ. Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 38–43.
  22. Linton SJ, Hallden K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain 1998; 14: 209–215.
  23. Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg H, Kreiner S, Jordan A. Low Back Pain Rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain 1994; 57: 317–326.
  24. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000; 25: 3115–3124.
  25. Albert HB, Jensen AM, Dahl D, Rasmussen MN. Kriterievalidering af Roland Morris-spørgeskamaet [Criteria validation of the Roland Morris questionnaire. A Danish translation of the international scale for the assessment of functional level in patients with low back pain and sciatica]. Ugeskr Laeger 2003; 165: 1875–1880 (in Danish).
  26. Schmidt I, Rechter L, Hansen VK, Andreasen J, Overvad K. Prognosis of subacute low back pain patients according to pain response. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 57–63.

Related articles

There are no related articles.



Full text



Link to corrected article


Related articles

Click here to show related articles

Print information

Volume 41, Issue 7

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0365

Pages: 545-549

View at PubMed