Content » Vol 93, Issue 4

Investigative Report

Clinical and Histological Prognostic Factors for Local Recurrence and Metastasis of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of a Defined Population

Marieke H. Roozeboom1,2, Bjorn G. P. M. Lohman3, Annet Westers-Attema1,2, Patty J. Nelemans4, Anita A. Botterweck5, Arienne M. W. van Marion3,6 and Nicole W. J. Kelleners-Smeets1,2

Departments of 1Dermatology, 3Pathology and 4Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 2GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 5Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Region Mid and South Limburg, and 6Department of Pathology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) can recur locally and can metastasize. The objective of this study was to identify clinical and histopathological prognostic factors for local recurrence and metastasis in cSCCs at any body site. Clinical and histopathological data were collected from 224 patients with cSCC. During the median follow-up period of 43 months (range 0–73 months) the cumulative probabilities of recurrence-free survival at 1, 2 and 4 years post-treatment were 98.0%, 96.9% and 94.7%, respectively, and for metastasis-free survival 98.1%, 97.0% and 95.9%, respectively. In univariate survival analyses, significant predictors for local recurrence were tumour diameter and tumour thickness. For metastasis this was invasion of deeper structures, location on the ear, poor differentiation, tumour diameter and tumour thickness. In multivariate survival analysis, every millimetre increase in both tumour diameter and tumour thickness were independent predictors for local recurrence as well as for metastasis and, therefore, it is important to report these in patients’ files. Defining prognostic variables is important for diagnostic work-up, treatment and follow-up for an individual patient. Key words: skin cancer; risk factors.

(Accepted September 28, 2012.)

Acta Derm Venereol 2013; 93: XX–XX.

Marieke H. Roozeboom, Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. E-mail: mh.roozeboom@mumc.nl

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common cancers of the skin. It has an annual incidence of 16 per 100,000 patients in Northern Europe and 754 per 100,000 patients in Australia, with the highest occurrence among elderly men (1). Worldwide incidence has increased rapidly in recent decades, and studies predicting a marked increase in cSCC over the next decade are of great concern to dermatologists and other physicians treating cSCC (2–4). The majority (80–90%) of cSCC have their origin on the skin of the head and neck region, due to years of chronic ultraviolet sun exposure mainly as a result of an outdoor occupation (5, 6). Although most people will not die of cSCC, there is a subgroup of these tumours that has metastatic spreading ability with fatal consequences (7). Metastasis occurs in 4–5% and local recurrence in 3–8% (8–13). It is of great importance to define prognostic factors in order to estimate the risk of metastasis and local recurrence of a single tumour because of the implications for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Features such as perineural invasion, immunosuppression and poor differentiation are known predictors of higher risk for metastasis and local recurrence (13–16). An increasing number of studies have emphasized the potential of tumour thickness as a prognostic factor for metastasis and local recurrence (11, 17–19). The Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) has adjusted the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system in 2009 and included prognostic factors (20). In contrast to the earlier staging system, tumours classified as T3 are now those tumours invading extradermal structures, such as bone, cartilage or skeletal muscle. Tumours invading the skull-base or axial skeleton are classified as T4.

The aim of this study was to determine which clinical and histopathological features of cSCC are associated with an increased risk of metastasis and local recurrence in cSCCs distributed over the whole body.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and procedures

The Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands (CCCNL), a regional registry, provided the data from all patients diagnosed with a cSCC between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2007 at Maastricht University Medical Centrum (MUMC). MUMC is both a regional hospital and a reference centre for dermatological oncology in The Netherlands. Patients were treated with a curative intent. Inclusion criteria were patients with histopathologically confirmed cSCC at any body site. Excluded were patients with cSCC in situ (e.g. Bowen’s disease, actinic keratosis and erythroplasia of Queyrat).

One tumour per patient was used for analysis. In patients who developed more than one cSCC during the study period, only the first diagnosed cSCC with corresponding histopathological findings was taken into account. Patient age was defined as the age at the moment of histopathological diagnosis.

Patient-related data, such as date of birth, gender, history and number of previous cSCC, immune suppression state, exposure to ionizing radiation and presence of genodermatosis, were extracted from electronic and hard copy patient files, as were tumour-related factors, such as localization, tumour diameter, and data on therapy, local recurrence or metastasis of the present cSCC and survival status. Skin biopsies and surgical (re-)excisions were examined microscopically and the diagnosis of cSCC was confirmed histopathologically by dermatopathologists. Histopathological slides were evaluated retrospectively by 2 independent investigators, a third-year pathology resident and a sixth-year medical student, who both evaluated all slides. The last-mentioned attended an intensive course, given by a dermatopathologist, in evaluating histological sections of cSCC. Consensus was achieved in case both investigators recorded different results. A random selection of histopatho­logical slides (22%) was evaluated by a dermatopathologist.

The following data were recorded: type of cSCC, tumour thickness and stage according to the 2009 UICC TNM classification. The following histopathological features were assessed; degree of differentiation, presence or absence of desmoplasia, perineural invasion, angio-invasion, inflammatory cell response, ulceration, necrosis, infiltrative growth, proliferation, actinic keratosis around cSCC, endo- or exophytic growth. Epidermal and deep resection margins, in mm, were measured exactly. Tumour thickness and macroscopic diameter were measured with an accuracy of 0.1 and 1 mm, respectively. Tumour thickness was measured starting at the stratum granulosum. Tumours were grouped into stages I–IV at the time of treatment. Differentiation was graded on a scale of good, moderate or poor (21). Inflammation response was recorded, with presence of lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils, neutrophils and histiocytes. Tissue was obtained from the Maastricht Pathology Tissue Collection (MPTC). Collection, storage and use of tissue and patient data were performed in agreement with the “Code for Proper Secondary Use of Human Tissue in the Netherlands” (22).

Surgical excision was performed with a standard clinical safety margin of 5 mm. In case of high-risk tumours in the head and neck region, larger margins up to 10 mm were used. The following histopathological features were assessed: degree of differentiation, presence or absence of desmoplasia, perineural invasion, angio-invasion, inflammatory cell response, ulceration, necrosis, infiltrative growth, proliferation, actinic keratosis around cSCC, endo- or exophytic growth. Re-excision was performed if excision borders still contained tumour cells or if tumour cells were close to the resection border. In a few cases of tumours in cosmetically sensitive areas, Mohs surgery was performed as described previously (23). When the resection margins were tumour-free on frozen section an additional safety margin of 2 mm was taken. In cases where no excision was performed, the biopsy was used for evaluation of all the mentioned variables.

Patient follow-up was performed every 3 months in the first year, every 4 months in the second year, and every 6 months during the following 3 years, until 5 years after diagnosis. Transplant patients and tumours with a diameter >20 mm were seen more frequently (24, 25). When lymph node or distant metastasis was suspected in T2 cSCC of the head/neck, an ultrasonic guided biopsy was performed. If local recurrence was suspected, a biopsy was performed for histopathological confirmation. Tumour residue was defined as tumour tissue that was present after incomplete surgical excision within 3 months post-treatment. Local recurrence was defined as a cSCC that was diagnosed after radical treatment or after more than 3 months in case of incomplete excision. Both residual and recurrent tumour tissue were defined as tumour tissue within 0.5 mm of the treated area. Discovered metastases or local recurrences were documented carefully, including the number of metastases, location and time to this event. In patients with metastasis and a history of multiple cSCCs, the tumour from which the metastatic disease came was determined by the tumour closest to the first draining lymph node. The time to metastasis or local recurrence was defined as the time from the date of treatment (excision or re-excision) to the date a metastasis or a recurrence was diagnosed. Study follow-up was closed on 31 August 2011.

Statistical analysis

Inter-observer agreement was evaluated by Cohen’s kappa coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (26). The effect of clinical and histopathological features of cSCC, evaluated by the first 2 observers, on local recurrence and metastasis was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Recurrence-free survival was defined as the absence of any local recurrence or metastasis during follow-up. Follow-up time was calculated from the date of treatment to the date of recurrence or the date of last follow-up (censoring date). Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. All data analyses were performed with SPSS–PC version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and STATA version 11 (STATA Corp., Texas, USA).

RESULTS

Descriptiones of study population

In the study period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007, 224 patients were diagnosed with a cSCC. The population comprised 131 males (58.5%) and 93 females (41.5%), mean age 72 years (range 12–91 years). All patient characteristics are summarized in Table I. A total of 35 patients (15.6%) were immunosuppressed; 22 patients with organ transplants, 6 with leukaemia, 4 with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and 3 using immunosuppressive medication. Median follow-up was 43 months (range 0–73 months).

Table I. Characteristics of the study population

Characteristics

No disease progression (n = 207)

Local recurrence (n = 11)

Metastasis (n = 7)

Age, years

Mean, range

71.8 (12–91)

74.9 (65–88)

77.7 (71–84)

Standard deviation

12.1

8.5

4.2

Median

75.0

73.0

78.0

Gender, n (%)

Male

119 (57.5)

6 (54.5)

6 (85.7)

Female

88 (42.5)

5 (45.5)

1 (14.3)

Time to last follow-up or event, months

Mean, range

40.0 (0–73)

20.5 (3–53)

13.0 (0–47)

Median

43.0

12.0

2.0

Number of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in history

0

173 (83.6)

9 (81.8)

7 (100.0)

1

19 (9.2)

1 (9.1)

0 (0.0)

≥ 2

7 (3.4)

1 (9.1)

0 (0.0)

Location of cSCC, n (%)

Ear

19 (9.2)

3 (27.3)

5 (71.4)

Lip

12 (5.8)

1 (9.1)

0 (0.0)

Other head/neck

109 (52.7)

5 (45.5)

1 (14.3)

Trunk

16 (7.7)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Upper extremities

32 (15.5)

1 (9.1)

0 (0.0)

Lower extremities

18 (8.7)

1 (9.1)

1 (14.3)

Unknown

1 (0.5)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Clinical tumour diameter, mm

Mean, range

12.9 (2.5–60.0)

18.7 (8.0–51.0)

23.0 (12–35)

Tumour-node-metastasis stage, n (%)

I

166 (80.2)

8 (72.7)

3 (42.9)

II

30 (14.5)

3 (27.3)

4 (57.1)

III

11 (5.3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

IV

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Immunosuppression, n (%)

Yes

33 (15.9)

1 (9.1)

1 (14.3)

No

174 (84.1)

10 (90.9)

6 (85.7)

Therapy, n (%)

Surgical excision

192 (92.8)

8 (64.7)

5 (71.4)

Mohs micrographic surgery

3 (1.4)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Radiotherapy (RT)

3 (1.4)

1 (9.1)

1 (14.3)

Surgical excision + RT

6 (2.9)

2 (18.2)

0 (0.0)

No therapy

3 (1.4)

0 (0.0)

1 (14.3)

Death, n (%)

62 (30.0)

5 (45.5)

3 (42.9)

Died of cSCC

0 (0.0)

2 (40.0)

3 (100.0)

Died of other reasons

62 (100.0)

3 (60.0)

0 (0.0)

Mean clinical tumour diameter was 13.3 mm (median 10.0; range 2.5–60.0) with 83.5% categorized into ≤ 20 mm. The most frequent primary site was the head and neck region (excluding ear and lip) in 51.3% (n = 115). Seventy-six percent (n = 171) of patients were categorized into stage I of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system 2009 at time of diagnosis.

Surgery was part of the treatment in 91.1% of patients. Mohs surgery was performed in 3 patients. The most common indication for radiotherapy (RT) was as adjuvant treatment in case of positive or narrow resection borders. One ear, one hand digit and one leg were amputated. Four patients did not receive any treatment. One patient had a biopsy-proven cSCC on his hand, but 2 weeks after the biopsy there was no visible lesion and no further treatment was performed. Another patient with metastasis received no therapy because he died within 2 weeks after diagnosis. One patient with cSCC extension into the orbita, sinus and nervus subra-orbitalis was inoperable and incurable. The fourth patient received no therapy, but the reason was not known.

Mean tumour thickness was 3.5 mm (median 2.9; range 0.4–18.5 mm) of which 155 (69.2%) were ≤ 4 mm (all histopathological characteristics are summarized in Table SI; available from http://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/content/?doi=10.2340/00015555-1501). Sixteen (7.1%) tumours invaded deeper structures and moderate differentiation was most common (n = 147, 65.6%). Perineural invasion and angio-invasion were seen in, respectively, 20 (8.9%) and 2 (0.9%) tumours.

Of all histopathological slides 22% were evaluated by a third observer (the dermatopathologist). Interobserver agreement was moderate to high for the following factors: tumour thickness ICC 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95), tumour differentiation kappa 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45–0.79) and perineural invasion kappa 0.64 (95% CI: 0.44–0.78).

Local recurrence occurred in 11 patients and metastasis in 7 patients, with a median time after treatment of 12 months (range 3–53 months) and 2 months (range 0–47 months), respectively (Table I). Clinical and histopathological characteristics of these cSCCs with local recurrence or metastasis are summarized in Table SII (available from http://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/content/?doi=10.2340/00015555-1501) and Fig. 1. One patient developed both a local recurrence and metastasis during follow-up.

Fig. 1. Box-plots showing the median, interquartile range and range of tumour diameter and tumour thickness for patients with local recurrence and metastasis.

9724.png

Prognosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

One-, 2- and 4-year cumulative probabilities of local recurrence-free survival were 98.0% (95% CI 94.8–99.3%), 96.9% (95% CI 93.2–98.6%) and 94.7% (95% CI 89.9–97.2%), respectively (Fig. 2). Cumulative probabilities of metastasis-free survival were 98.1% (95% CI 95.1–99.3%), 97.0% (95% CI 93.4–98.6%) and 95.9% (95% CI 91.1–98.1%) at 1, 2 and 4 years, respectively.

3824fig1.tif

Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for local recurrence and metastasis.

Predictors of local recurrence and metastasis

Univariate analysis showed that tumour diameter and tumour thickness have significant association with higher risk of local recurrence. Localization on the ear and invasion of deeper structures also contributed to a higher risk, but the small number of events limited the statistical power. Prognostic factors associated with significantly increased risk of metastasis were, from highest to lowest HR: location on the ear, invasion of deeper structures, no surgical treatment, poor differentiation and tumour thickness and tumour diameter (Table II). Perineural invasion is also likely to be a contributing prognostic factor.

Table II. Univariate survival analysis of predictors for metastasis and local recurrence

Local recurrence (n = 11)

Metastasis (n = 7)

HR (95% CI)

p-value

HR (95% CI)

p-value

Localizationa

Ear

3.2 (0.7–13.8)

0.123

21.3 (2.5–182.2)

0.005

Lip

1.5 (0.2–12.7)

0.729

Trunk/extremities

0.4 (0.1–2.2)

0.298

1.5 (0.1–23.5)

0.787

Immunosuppression

0.7 (0.3–2.0)

0.502

0.9 (0.3–2.6)

0.845

Tumour diameter, mm

1.1 (1.0–1.1)

0.015

1.1 (1.0–1.1)

0.001

Tumour thickness, mm

1.3 (1.1–1.5)

< 0.0001

1.2 (1.1–1.4)

0.010

Invasion deeper structures

Present vs. absent

4.3 (0.9–20.3)

0.065

20.8 (4.6–93.7)

< 0.0001

Differentiation

Poor vs. good/moderate

2.9 (0.4–23.2)

0.316

15.7 (3.5–70.3)

< 0.0001

Perineural invasion

Present vs. absent

2.2 (0.5–10.2)

0.328

4.4 (0.9–22.7)

0.077

Surgical treatment

No vs. yes

4.5 (0.6–35.9)

0.151

19.9 (3.6–108.8)

0.001

areference other head/neck

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval. Significant values are shown in bold.

Our assumption that tumour diameter and tumour thickness are correlated was confirmed (R=0.33, p < 0.0001). Therefore, we used multivariate survival analysis to evaluate the independent effect of each factor. The results show that both local recurrence and tumour thickness are independent predictors (Table III). Other tumour characteristics, such as angio-invasion, perineural invasion and ulceration, were not independent predictors for metastasis or local recurrence after simultaneous adjustment for tumour diameter and tumour thickness.

Table III. Multivariate survival analysis of predictors for metastasis (n = 7) and local recurrence (n = 11)

Local recurrence

Metastasis

HR (95% CI)

p-value

HR (95% CI)

p-value

Tumour diameter, mm

1.1 (1.0–1.1)

0.048

1.1 (1.0–1.1)

0.018

Tumour thickness, mm

1.3 (1.1–1.5)

0.002

1.2 (1.0–1.5)

0.042

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

This study supports the hypothesis that tumour thickness and tumour size are both important prognostic factors in cSCC at any body site. Evaluation of the independent effect of each of these 2 predictors in multivariate analysis showed that tumour diameter and tumour thickness were independent prognostic factors for local recurrence as well as for metastasis. This corroborates the findings of a large prospective study by Brantsch et al. (11).

Our results were obtained from a population of patients treated at a reference centre for dermatological oncology, which may have led to the inclusion of a selected population. This may have consequences for the calculation of the cumulative incidence of local recurrence and metastasis, but may be less relevant for the identification of risk factors. We do not expect that prognostic factors, the focus of our study, will be very different in our centre from those in other centres, because we assume that the underlying biological mechanisms are universal. In addition, we found comparable percentages of metastasis and local recurrences as those of previous studies (9, 11). The significant results with respect to prognostic factors in this study, such as invasion of deeper structures, location on the ear, poor differentiation, tumour diameter and tumour thickness, are in agreement with those of other studies (7, 11, 15, 27, 28).

A strength of this study is that more than 95% of the necessary information was found despite the retrospective design of the study. Furthermore, there was no restriction to particular subsets of patients with cSCC, whereas other studies included only patients with moderately to poorly differentiated lesions or with lesions originating in the head and neck region (19, 28, 29). Our study included cSCCs from various parts of the body. This allowed the evaluation of a high number of histological factors judged by 3 independent observers. Finally, with a median follow-up of 43 months it is likely that the majority of all local recurrences and metastasis could be captured (13).

This study has a number of limitations. We collected data of 224 patients with a small number of local recurrences or metastasis. It is therefore possible, that small, but relevant, associations between some of the studied histopathological characteristics and prognosis of cSCC could not be detected due to lack of power. Interobserver agreement was moderate to high for tumour thickness, tumour differentiation and perineural invasion. However, interobserver agreement was poor for part of the studied histopathological characteristics.

Identification of predictors for higher risk of local recurrence and metastasis has consequences for tumour staging. Staging of cSCC is carried out according to the UICC TNM classification system. In 2009, the UICC TNM classification system was adjusted (20, 30). In case of 2 or more additional risk factors (> 4 mm depth, Clark level V, perineural invasion, angio-invasion, localization on the ear or lip, and poorly or undifferentiated tumours) in T1 tumours, the tumour is classified as a stage II tumour. Comparison of the previous and present UICC TNM classification system revealed a shift from 11 patients with stage I cSCC to stage II. Two (18%) of these patients developed a local recurrence of their cSCC. This indicates that staging of cSCC is indeed relevant to define prognosis.

In this study evaluating prognostic factors of cSCC at any body site, we found additional evidence that both tumour diameter and tumour thickness are important prognostic factors for local recurrence as well as for metastasis. As metastasis can also occur outside the head and neck area, it is important to know whether prognostic variables differ. To better define high- and low-risk tumours, it is important to report the diameter in the clinical file and the tumour thickness in the histological report. Omitting 1 of these 2 factors makes accurate determination of prognosis difficult. Other clinical and histopathological characteristics, such as location on the ear, poor differentiation and invasion of deeper structures, are also important in determining prognosis. Larger prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results and to identify additional clinical and mainly histopathological features that affect prognosis. Better knowledge of prognostic variables helps to define the high-risk patient who requires more radical treatment and a closer follow-up. In this respect, inclusion of tumour thickness for staging, as implemented in the adjusted UICC TNM classification system, is an important improvement.

REFERENCES

1. Stern RS. The mysteries of geographic variability in nonmelanoma skin cancer incidence. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 843–844.

2.
de Vries E, van de Poll-Franse LV, Louwman WJ, de Gruijl FR, Coebergh JW. Predictions of skin cancer incidence in the Netherlands up to 2015. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152: 481–488.

3.
Staples M, Marks R, Giles G. Trends in the incidence of non-melanocytic skin cancer (NMSC) treated in Australia 1985–1995: are primary prevention programs starting to have an effect? Int J Cancer 1998; 78: 144–148.

4.
Gray DT, Suman VJ, Su WP, Clay RP, Harmsen WS, Roenigk RK. Trends in the population-based incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin first diagnosed between 1984 and 1992. Arch Dermatol 1997; 133: 735–740.

5.
Veness MJ. Advanced non melanoma skin cancers of the head and neck: an overview on management. Cancer Forum 2006; 30: 195–201.

6.
Ramirez CC, Federman DG, Kirsner RS. Skin cancer as an occupational disease: the effect of ultraviolet and other forms of radiation. Int J Dermatol 2005; 44: 95–100.

7.
Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, Zhou X, Duvic M, El-Naggar AK, et al. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 759–765.

8.
Petter G, Haustein UF. Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin – histopathological features and their significance for the clinical outcome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1998; 11: 37–44.

9.
Mourouzis C, Boynton A, Grant J, Umar T, Wilson A, Macpheson D, et al. Cutaneous head and neck SCCs and risk of nodal metastasis – UK experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009; 37: 443–447.

10.
Weinberg AS, Ogle CA, Shim EK. Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: an update. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33: 885–899.

11.
Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonfisch B, Trilling B, Wehner-Caroli J, Rocken M, et al. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 713–720.

12.
Eroglu A, Berberoglu U, Berreroglu S. Risk factors related to locoregional recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Surg Oncol 1996; 61: 124–130.

13.
Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 26: 976–990.

14.
Ch’ng S, Maitra A, Lea R, Brasch H, Tan ST. Parotid metastasis – an independent prognostic factor for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 1288–1293.

15.
Quaedvlieg PJ, Creytens DH, Epping GG, Peutz-Kootstra CJ, Nieman FH, Thissen MR, et al. Histopathological characteristics of metastasizing squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and lips. Histopathology 2006; 49: 256–264.

16.
Cherpelis BS, Marcusen C, Lang PG. Prognostic factors for metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28: 268–273.

17.
Dinehart SM, Peterson S. Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and proposal of a new staging system. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 1379–1384.

18.
Veness MJ. High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Biomed Biotechnol 2007: 80572.

19.
Jensen V, Prasad AR, Smith A, Raju M, Wendel CS, Schmelz M, et al. Prognostic criteria for squamous cell cancer of the skin. J Surg Res 2009; 159: 509–516.

20.
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Carcinoma of skin. Wiley-Blackwell 2009; 165–168.

21.
Cassarino DS, Derienzo DP, Barr RJ. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive clinicopathologic classification. Part one. J Cutaneous Pathol 2006; 33: 191–206.

22. Oosterhuis JW, Coebergh JW, van Veen EB. Tumour banks: well-guarded treasures in the interest of patients. Nature Reviews Cancer 2003; 3: 73–77.

23. Smeets NW, Kuijpers DI, Nelemans P, Ostertag JU, Verhaegh ME, Krekels GA, et al. Mohs’ micrographic surgery for treatment of basal cell carcinoma of the face – results of a retrospective study and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151: 141–147.

24.
Veness MJ. Defining patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Australas J Dermatol 2006; 47: 28–33.

25.
Motley R, Kersey P, Lawrence C. Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146: 18–25.

26.
Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agree­ment. Radiology 2003; 228: 303–308.

27.
Mullen JT, Feng L, Xing Y, Mansfield PF, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, et al. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: defining a high-risk group. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 902–909.

28.
Kyrgidis A, Tzellos TG, Kechagias N, Patrikidou A, Xirou P, Kitikidou K, et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck: risk factors of overall and recurrence-free survival. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 1563–1572.

29.
Oddone N, Morgan GJ, Palme CE, Perera L, Shannon J, Wong E, et al. Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: the Immunosuppression, Treatment, Extranodal spread, and Margin status (ITEM) prognostic score to predict outcome and the need to improve survival. Cancer 2009; 115: 1883–1891.

30.
Farasat S, Yu SS, Neel VA, Nehal KS, Lardaro T, Mihm MC, et al. A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: creation and rationale for inclusion of tumor (T) characteristics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 64: 1051–1059.