Content » Vol 90, Issue 2

Letter to the Editor

Naevus Lentiginosus Linearis: A Distinct Skin Disorder

Rudolf Happle1, Dieter Metze2, and Ángel Vera Casaño3

Department of Dermatology, 1Philipp University of Marburg, Deutschhaus-Str. 9, DE-35033 Marburg, 2University of Münster, Münster, Germany, and 3Department of Dermatology, Complejo Hospitalario “Carlos Haya”, Málaga, Spain. E-mail: happle@med.uni-marburg.de

Accepted October 29, 2009

Sir,

Congenital naevi of the melanocytic system include numerous types, which differ in their clinical appearance, pattern of distribution, and histopathological features (1). Examples are large congenital melanocytic naevus, macular naevus spilus, papular naevus spilus, café-au-lait macules of neurofibromatosis 1, café-au-lait macules arranged in broad bands as noted in McCune-Albright syndrome, partial unilateral lentiginosis, naevus achromicus (naevus depigmentosus), phylloid hypermelanosis, and phylloid hypomelanosis (1–3).

We describe here two patients with a systematized pigmentary naevus that differed from all naevi reported so far.

CASE REPORTS

Case 1

A 13-year-old girl presented with a pigmentary naevus present since birth. Her family history was non-contributory. Several narrow bands following Blaschko’s lines involved the right side of her body with a strict midline separation (Fig. 1 A, B). These lesions consisted of multiple tightly packed lentigines. On careful palpation, no papules could be found. The background of the lentigines was neither hyper- nor hypopigmented. In addition to the linear pigmentary lesions, the girl had mild, symmetrically distributed freckling of the forehead, the nose and the cheek. No extracutaneous anomalies were noted. In particular, neurological and ophthalmological examinations gave normal results. Histopathological examination of two specimens obtained from the lentiginous lesions showed pronounced hyperpigmentation of the basal cell layer (Fig. 2A).

 

3163fig1.jpg

Fig. 1. Tightly packed lentigines distributed in a band-like pattern involving: (A) the right side of the thorax and the right arm; (B) the right flank (case 1); and (C) tightly packed lentigines arranged in a linear pattern (case 2).

 

3163fig2.jpg

Fig. 2. (A) Pronounced hyperpigmentation of basal and suprabasal keratinocytes (haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining; case 1). (B) A lentigo specimen of case 2 showing normal numbers of melanocytes over large areas, stained with the pan-Mel marker recognizing HMB-45 and Mart-1 antigens as well as tyrosinase (immunoperoxidase; antibody from Dako Co., Glostrup, Denmark), whereas in other areas the amount of melanocytes is found to be increased, especially in (C) the apical areas of the rete pegs (H&E staining)

DISCUSSION

These patients had an unusual congenital pigmentary disorder that, to our knowledge, did not correspond to any of the various types of pigmentary naevi known so far (Table I). In particular, the tightly packed lentigines did not show any abnormal background in the form of hyper- or hypo-pigmentation.

Table I. Distinguishing clinical criteria of different types of naevi associated with lentigines

Disorders

Pattern of
distributiona

Abnormal background pigmentation

Macular naevus spilus

Checkerboard

Café-au-lait background

Papular naevus spilus

Checkerboard

Café-au-lait background

Partial unilateral lentiginosis (agminated lentigines)

Flag-like or
checkerboard

No

Naevus achromicus with secondary lentigines

Flag-like or
Blaschko lines

Hypopigmented background

Linear lentiginous naevus

Blaschko lines

No

aThe terms “zosteriform” or “dermatomal” are misnomers and therefore should be avoided.

The disorder follows Blaschko’s lines and therefore clearly reflects cutaneous mosaicism (3). The condition differs from naevus spilus maculosus (2) by the absence of background hyperpigmentation and by the arrangement along Blaschko’s lines. The same holds for naevus spilus papulosus that differs, in addition, by the presence of papular speckles (2). Contrasting with the Blaschko-linear arrangement as noted in the present cases, partial unilateral lentiginosis that is also called “agminated lentigines” (1) and that is considered by some authors to represent a mosaic form of neurofibromatosis 1 (4–6) is arranged in a checkerboard pattern (7). Naevus achromicus with secondary lentigines (8) can be excluded in our patients because the lesions did not show any hypopigmentation.

In conclusion, the pigmentary disorder described here may represent a new entity, for which we propose the name naevus lentiginosus linearis (linear lentiginous naevus).

References

  • Grichnik JM, Rhodes AR, Sober AJ. Benign hyperplasias and neoplasias of melanocytes. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, editors. Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine, 6th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003, p. 881–905.
  • Happle R. Speckled lentiginous naevus: which of the two disorders do you mean? Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34: 133–135.
  • Happle R. Pigmentary patterns associated with human mosaicism: a proposed classification. Eur J Dermatol 1993; 3: 170–174.
  • Gerhards G, Hamm H. Die unilaterale Lentiginose – eine segmentale Neurofibromatose ohne Neurofibrome Hautarzt. 1992; 43: 491–495.
  • Wong SS. Bilateral segmental neurofibromatosis with partial unilateral lentiginosis. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136: 380–383.
  • Chen W, Fan PC, Happle R. Partial unilateral lentiginosis with ipsilateral Lisch nodules and axillary freckling. Dermatology 2004; 209: 321–324.
  • matology 2004; 209: 321–324.
  • Davis DG, Shaw MW. An unusual human mosaic for skin pigmentation. N Engl J Med 1964; 270: 1384–1389.
  • Bolognia JL, Lazova R, Watsky K. The development of lentigines within segmental achromic naevi. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 330–333.