Content » Vol 88, Issue 5

Letter to the Editor

Ciliated Cyst of the Vulva: Oestrogen and Progesterone Receptors

Shuichi Kuniyuki1, Yuko Fukushima2, Yuki Yoshida1, Kazuhoshi Yamanaka1, Naoki Maekawa1 and Takeshi Inoue2

1Division of Dermatology, and 2Division of Pathology, Osaka City General Hospital, Miyakojima-Hondori 2-13-22, Miyakojima-ku, 534-0021, Osaka, Japan. E-mail: kuniyuki@ocgh.hospital.city.osaka.jp

Accepted March 5, 2008.

Sir,

Cases of cutaneous cysts lined by ciliated epithelium have rarely been documented, and only a few cases of such cysts in the vulvar vestibulae have been reported (1–3). The origin of the cysts is controversial because the location is so anatomically specific. In this report, we describe a 14-year-old girl with a ciliated cyst of the vulva (CCV), the lining cells of which were positive for oestrogen and progesterone receptors, and discuss the pathogenesis of ciliated epithelium.

CASE REPORT

A 14-year-old Japanese girl was referred to our outpatient clinic for the evaluation of a 2-month history of a pedunculated mass on the vulva. The mass was elastic hard, measuring 2 cm in diameter, and was pedunculated on the mid-portion of the right labium minus. It had a slack skin surface and was slightly pigmented (Fig. 1). The patient was healthy and laboratory investigations showed no abnormal haematological results and no history of either oestrogen or progesterone treatment. Under local anaesthesia, the patient underwent complete resection of the vulvar mass. Histopathological examination revealed that the mass was a submucosal cyst lined by a single layer and partly pseudostratified by 4–5 layers of cuboidal and columnar epithelium with ciliated cells, resembling Müllerian epithelium, with occasional papillary projections (Figs 2 and 3). No smooth muscle was identified in the supporting tissues beneath the lining epithelium. Only the luminar border of the cells stained faintly with Alcian-blue and Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain even after diastase digestion. Immunohistochemically, the lining epithelium was positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and cytokeratin (CK) 7, and negative for S-100 protein, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CK 20 and α-smooth muscle actin. The patient was diagnosed as having a CCV.

 

2852fig1.tif

Fig. 1. Clinical appearance of ciliated cyst of the vulva.

2852fig2.tif

Fig. 2. The wall of the lesion was composed of both epithelial and loose connective tissue elements (haematoxylin-eosin stain (H&E), ×40).

2852fig3.tif

Fig. 3. The lining epithelium of the cyst is composed mainly of (a) a single row and (b) pseudostratified cuboidal and columnar cells intermingled with ciliated cells (H&E stain, ×400).

Discussion

Cases of CCV (also known as paramesonephric cysts) are reported in the 25–35-year-old age group of young women and are occasionally associated with pregnancy or exogenous progesterone. Only a few case of CCV in the vulva vestibulae have been reported (1–3). Clinically, the cysts contained fluid, occurred on the superior portion of the labia minora and measured 1–3 cm. No cases of either multifocal lesions or recurrences have been reported. Excision of the lesion should be curative. The aetiology is unknown; however, heterotopia (sequestration and migration of Müllerian tissue during embryogenesis), dysontogenesis (defective embryonic development), prosoplasia (abnormal development resulting in organization), and metaplasia have been suggested as mechanisms for the origin of the cyst. Of these hypotheses, Müllerian heterotopia has been most commonly proposed to be the basis of similar histopathological features of the epithelium (4, 5).

The origin of the ciliated epithelium of CCV is unclear, although there are 3 theories: (i) displacement of Müllerian duct remnants, (ii) ciliated epithelial cell metaplasia of the sweat gland, and (iii) urogenital sinus origin. There are the following possibilities: heterotopia (embryonic displacement of tissue in other areas) dysontogenesis (defective embryonic development of individuals), prosoplasia (progressive transformation), and ciliated epithelial cell metaplasia. Among these, the possibility of heterotopia (misplacement of Müllerian duct tissue) is considered high (1, 5). The epithelium of the fallopian tube consists of a single layer of ciliated cells, non-ciliated columnar secretory cells, and intercalated cells.

The cyst wall in the present case was lined by a single row or pseudostratified columnar or cuboidal cells which exhibit cilia on the luminar aspect, showing similar features to the fallopian tube histologically, and was hypothesized to be oestrogen-dependent Müllerian heterotopia during embryogenesis. In fact, ciliogenesis produced by oestrogen administration has been reported in various animals (6).

In contrast, cutaneous ciliated cyst (CCC) is found very rarely in females as a single lesion, largely in the lower extremities, and even more rarely in males and on the back (7, 8). CCC was reported to rapidly increase in size during pregnancy, suggesting that these lesions are sensitive to hormonal stimulation (9). Epithelial cells in CCC demonstrated nuclear staining for oestrogen receptor (7, 8, 10). CCC is considered by some authors to be the same entity as CCV (11). The detection of intranuclear ER and PR within the CCC lends strong support that hormonal stimulation plays a role in the development of these lesions.

Leonforte (12) reported a case of cutaneous ciliated cystadenoma with columnar ciliated cells and apical caps in the heel of a man that was thought to have originated as sweat gland metaplasia. However, the present case might not originate from sweat gland metaplasia on the basis of negative staining for CEA and S-100, and the absence of histological features such as decapitation or apical formation. Therefore, there is only a slight possibility that CCV originated from ciliated metaplasia of eccrine or apocrine glands in the present case.

Robboy et al. (13) reported 11 mucinous and ciliated cysts on the vulva, suggesting urogenital sinus origin (4, 13). Previously, the presence of ER on the lining epithelium of CCV was evaluated only by Hamada et al. (3), whose case was negative for ER, and CEA; therefore, their case might have been of urogenital sinus origin.

In contrast, both reported cases of retroperitoneal Müllerian cyst (14) and parafallopian tube transitional cell carcinoma (15) showed that its lining cells were positive for CK 7, EMA, ER and PR, and negative for CK 20, CEA on immunohistochemical study, the same as the present case, suggesting that the lesion originated from the developing Müllerian apparatus (Table I).

Table I. Immunohistochemical analysis for ciliated cysts

Diagnosis of the cyst

EMA

S-100

CEA

ER

PR

CK7

CK20

Reference

Cutaneous ciliated cyst

+

+ (< 10%)

+ (< 10%)

NT

NT

NT

Yokozaki et al. (10)

Cutaneous ciliated cyst

+

+

NT

NT

NT

Fontaine et al. (8)

Ciliated cyst of the vulva

+

NT

NT

NT

NT

Kang et al. (2)

Ciliated cyst of the vulva

+

NT

NT

NT

Hamada et al. (3)

Peritoneal Mullerian cyst

+

NT

+

+

+

Konishi et al. (14)

Parafallopian tube transitional cell carcinoma

NT

NT

NT

+

+

+

Paner et al. (15)

Ciliated cyst of the vulva (the present case)

+

+

+

+

EMA: epithelial membrane antigen; S-100: S-100 protein; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; ER: oestrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; CK 7: cytokeratin 7; CK 20: cytokeratin 20; NT: not tested.

The present case is the first case of CCV with the lining epithelium positive for ER and PR. In conclusion, these histopathological and immunohistochemical findings strongly support the hypothesis that CCV is Müllerian heterotopia.

References

1. Hart WR. Paramesonephric mucinous cysts of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 107: 1079–1084.

2. Kang IK, Kim YJ, Choi KC. Ciliated cyst of the vulva. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 514–515.

3. Hamada M, Kiryu H, Ohta T, Furue M. Ciliated cyst of the vulva. Eur J Dermatol 2004; 14: 347–349.

4. Newland JR, Fusaro RM. Mucinous cyst of the vulva. Nebraska Med J 1991; 76: 307–310.

5. True L, Golitz LE. Ciliated plantar cyst. Arch Dermatol 1980; 116: 1066–1067.

6. Anderson RGW, Hein CE. Estrogen dependent ciliogenesis in the chick oviduct. Cell Tiss Res 1976; 171: 459–466.

7. Sickel JZ. Cutaneous ciliated cyst of the scalp: a case report with immunohistochemical evidence for estrogen and progesterone receptors. Am J Dermatopathol 1994; 16: 76–79.

8. Fontaine DG, Lau H, Murray SK, Fraser RB, Wright Jr JR. Cutaneous ciliated cyst of the abdominal wall. Am J Dermatopathol 2002; 24: 63–66.

9. Butterworth RGW, Stewart M, Clark JV. Heterotopic ciliated epithelium: Müllerian origin? Lancet 1970; 1: 1400–1401.

10. Yokozaki H, Yanagawa E, Harada M, Tahara E. Cutaneous ciliated cyst of the right lower leg. Pathol Int 1999; 49: 354–357.

11. Kurban RS, Bhawan J. Cutaneous cysts lined by nonsquamous epithelium. Am J Dermatopathol 1991; 13: 509–517.

12. Leonforte JF. Cutaneous ciliated cystadenoma in a man. Arch Dermatol 1982; 118: 1010–1012.

13. Robboy SJ, Ross JS, Prat J, Keh PC, Welch WR. Urogenital sinus origin of mucinous and ciliated cysts of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol 1977; 51: 347–351.

14. Konishi E, Nakashima Y, Iwasaki T. Immunohistochemical analysis of retroperitoneal Müllerian cyst. Hum Pathol 2003; 34: 194–198.

15. Paner GP, Gonzalez M, Al-Masri H, Smith DM, Husain AN. Parafallopian tube transitional cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 86: 379–383.