Content » Vol 86, Issue 5

Clinical Report

Penile Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Results of Photodynamic Therapy

John Paoli1, Annika Ternesten Bratel2, Gun-Britt Löwhagen1, Bo Stenquist1, Ola Forslund3 and Ann-Marie Wennberg1

1Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 2Capio Diagnostics, Histopathology, Göteborg, and 3Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Lund, Malmö General Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

Failure of response to treatment or recurrent disease is often noted in patients with penile intraepithelial neoplasia. Photodynamic therapy has recently been added to the list of treatment modalities used for this diagnosis. Our primary objective was to study the results of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of penile intraepithelial neoplasia in men over the age of 40 years. Ten patients aged 42–82 years with histopathologically confirmed lesions were studied. Lesions initially responded to photodynamic therapy in 7 out of 10 patients. Four of these patients presented no recurrences during a mean follow-up of 35 months, and were completely cleared after 2–8 treatments (mean 4.5 treatments). Three patients presented recurrences after treatment. No patient developed invasive penile cancer (mean follow-up 46.5 months). Photodynamic therapy is an alternative in the treatment of penile intraepithelial neoplasia, although prospective randomized trials are required to provide therapeutic guidelines. Key words: Bowen’s disease; bowenoid papulosis; erythroplasia of Queyrat; human papilloma virus; lichen sclerosus.

(Accepted May 8, 2006.)

Acta Derm Venereol 2006; 86: 418–421.

John Paoli, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-41345 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail: john.paoli@vgregion.se

Pre-cancerous lesions of the penile epithelium are also known as penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). In 1911, Queyrat (1) introduced the term “erythroplasia of Queyrat” to depict pre-malignant velvety-red lesions of the glans, and Bowen (2) coined the term “Bowen’s disease” in 1912 to define single, scaly plaques with histopathological features of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in situ. Bowenoid papulosis was first described by Lloyd in 1970 (3) and recognized as an entity in 1978 (4). Bowenoid papulosis, characterized by multicentric reddish brown maculopapular lesions of benign appearance on the genitals of young adults, rarely leads to the development of cancer, but progress to SCC has been reported (5). All 3 entities show histopathological signs of SCC in situ and are therefore synonymous with PIN (6).

As opposed to the generally benign course of Bowenoid papulosis in younger patients, middle-aged and elderly patients often present solitary PIN lesions with an increased risk of progression to SCC (7). The management of these PIN lesions has proved to be difficult and recurrences are common. Therapeutic alternatives including local excision, Mohs’ micrographic surgery, topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cryosurgery, electrocauterization, carbon dioxide (CO2) laser ablation, interferon and topical 5% imiquimod have been used with varying success rates (7–13). Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been added to the list of possibilities for the treatment of PIN (14–18), but an insufficient number of patients has been treated to evaluate its potential.

In this study we present our results of PDT in the treatment of PIN in middle-aged and elderly men.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

Eleven men aged 40 years or above with histopathologically confirmed PIN lesions were treated with PDT between 1999 and 2004 at our dermatological clinic in Göteborg, Sweden. Ten of these patients (aged 42–82 years) were followed up in the present study. One patient who had been treated successfully for a PIN lesion on the glans had developed a cancer of the urethra and was not available for the study. All patients had completed their PDT sessions at the time of inclusion, except for one who was included during ongoing treatment.

A thorough history was taken regarding lichen sclerosus, condyloma, human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, circumcision, smoking habits and previous treatments of PIN. A physical examination of the genitals and groin lymph nodes was performed. Patients with lesions on the glans close to the urethral meatus or with urinary symptoms were referred to a urologist for assessment.

Approval of the study was granted by the local ethics committee. An informed consent document was signed by all subjects included.

Histopathological examination and HPV detection

Punch biopsies performed before treatment in all patients were re-examined by a single histopathologist to verify the diagnosis of PIN and determine the evidence of lichen sclerosus and/or signs of HPV infection. New biopsies were taken when recurrences were suspected. Tissue samples for HPV detection were obtained from PIN lesions in 5 patients and from skin areas without remaining lesions after treatment in the other 5 patients. HPV detection and typing was performed using a combination of PCR (19) and reverse hybridization (20) on punch biopsy tissue in 8 patients and on swab samples collected from the surface of treated skin areas in 2. To ensure the quality of the extracted DNA, all samples were analysed and found to be positive for the beta-globin gene (21). Nine of 10 patients were smokers or ex-smokers. None of the patients had undergone neonatal circumcision.

Photodynamic therapy

PDT was performed by application of a topical photosensitizing agent covered by an adhesive occlusive dressing (TegadermTM, 3M Corp, Neuss, Germany) during 3 h. After removal of dressings and excess cream, the area was illuminated with red light. Anaesthesia with 5% lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA®, AstraZeneca AB, Mölndal, Sweden), intralesional 1% lidocaine (Xylocain®, AstraZeneca AB) or dorsal penile nerve block with 1% lidocaine (Xylocain®) was administered to all patients prior to illumination. Two different PDT methods were used:

ALA PDT. In 9 patients 20% delta-5-aminolaevulinic acid in Unguentum Merck was used as the topical photosensitizing agent, prior to illumination by incoherent light from a Waldmann PDT 1200L lamp (Herbert Waldmann GmbH, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany) with an emission spectrum of 600–730 nm, a total fluence of 50–80 J/cm2 and fluence rates of 35–80 mW/cm2.

Methyl-aminolevulinate PDT. More recently, 3 patients were treated with 16% methyl aminolevulinate cream (Metvix®, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) as the topical photosensitizing agent and illumination by red incoherent light from an Aktilite® CL128 LED lamp (PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) with an emission spectrum of 570–670 nm, a total fluence of 37 J/cm2 and a fluence rate of 37 mW/cm2.

Two patients received treatment with both methods.

RESULTS

Treatment

Clearance of PIN lesions was observed initially in 7 of 10 patients treated with PDT (Table I). Four patients were completely cleared from PIN after 2–8 treatments (mean 4.5 treatments) without recurrences during a mean follow-up of 35 months after the first completed series of PDT. Three patients presented recurrences after PDT. Patient 2 recurred after 11 months; patient 5, after 14 months; and patient 7, after 1 month. Patient 4 showed no response to PDT, but had also presented recurrences or poor response to several other therapeutic alternatives. The other 2 patients with incomplete clearance of PIN lesions (patients 1 and 8) only underwent one PDT session. Recurrences occurred after all treatment modalities. No patients developed invasive SCCs during our follow-up (mean follow-up 46.5 months after the first completed series of PDT).

Table I. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) lesions treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT): PIN location and type, human papilloma virus (HPV) types detected, presence of lichen sclerosus (LS), PDT parameters, clinical results and other therapies.

Pat.no.

Age (years)

PIN location

PIN type

HPV type

LS

PDT method

TF/FR

Times treated

Clinical result

Recurrence

Previous therapy

Therapy after PDT

F/U (m)

1

78

P, Sc

BD

16, 45, 56

No

ALA

80/80

1

Neg

Ec, Exc

35

2

49

S

BD

16

No

ALA

m-ALA

60/60

37/37

2

12

Pos

Neg

Yes

Exc

Exc

38

3

52

G

EQ

n.d.

Yes

ALA

50/50

3

Pos

No

Exc

35

4

55

P, G

BP

16*

Yes

ALA

m-ALA

35–60/50–60

37/37

7

8

Neg

Neg

Ec, CO2, 5-FU

Ec, CO2, Im, Exc

92

5

82

S, P

BP

n.d.

No

ALA

60/60

2

Pos

Yes

Ec

Ec, Im, Exc

45

6

59

G

EQ

n.d.

No

ALA

40–65/40–65

8

Pos

No

Ec

40

7

71

P

BP, BD

16

No

ALA

60/60

70/70

2

1

Pos

Neg

Yes

Ec

Ec, Im, Exc

57

8

72

P

BD

n.d.

No

ALA

60/60

1

Neg

Ec, Exc

58

9

65

P, G

BD

n.d.

Yes

ALA

70/70

2

Pos

No

56

10

42

P

BP

18*

No

m-ALA

37/37

5

Pos

No

9

P, mucosal prepuce; G, glans; S, shaft; Sc, scrotum; BD, Bowen’s disease; EQ, erythroplasia of Queyrat; BP, bowenoid papulosis; n.d., not detected in samples taken after therapy; ALA, PDT with aminolaevulinic acid; m-ALA, PDT with methyl aminolevulinate; TF/FR, total fluence in J/cm2 and fluence rates in mW/cm2; Pos, complete clearance; Neg, incomplete clearance; Ec, electrocauterization; Exc, local excision; CO2, carbon dioxide laser ablation; 5-FU, 5-fluoro-uracil; Im, 5% imiquimod; F/U, follow-up; m, months.

*Tissue sample collection before PDT.

All our patients experienced a certain degree of pain during PDT. This pain was tolerated after anaesthesia using topical lidocaine-prilocaine cream, lidocaine infiltration or dorsal penile nerve block. Superficial erosions were common after PDT, but healed in a matter of days. No scarring or deformities were observed.

HPV infection and other aetiological factors

HPV DNA was not detected in any of the 5 tissue samples obtained from skin areas without remaining lesions after treatment. Three of these samples were collected from skin areas in which PIN lesions had cleared completely after PDT. However, HPV DNA was detected in all 5 patients with PIN lesions present at the time of sample collection. In these cases, tissue samples were obtained from remaining PIN lesions after PDT in patients nos. 1, 2 and 7 and from PIN lesions before PDT in patients nos. 4 and 10. HPV DNA positive tissue samples were not collected from any areas afflicted by lichen sclerosus. HPV 16 was detected in 4 patients and HPV 18 was found in another. In patient 1, HPV 16 was detected in biopsy material from the prepuce and HPV types 45 and 56 were found in tissue from a PIN lesion of the scrotum. Microscopic verification of lichen sclerosus was observed in 3 patients (patients 3, 4 and 9).

DISCUSSION

Until now, only a few case reports have been published concerning the treatment of PIN with PDT (14, 15, 17, 18). Our study on 10 patients is thus the largest series published to date. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to provide therapeutic guidelines for treating PIN with PDT, since the number of sessions required is uncertain.

In our study, PIN lesions were completely cleared with PDT in 7 of 10 patients. Four of these presented no recurrences during a mean follow-up of 35 months and cleared after at least 2 treatments (range 2–8 treatments). Three patients had recurrences after treatment. Two lesions that resisted clearance were treated with only one session, which was probably insufficient to assess the possible results. A larger number of patients should be treated in order to observe any differences in how erythroplasia of Queyrat, Bowen’s disease and bowenoid papulosis respond to PDT. New topical photosensitizing agents and light sources are constantly being introduced and may improve results.

Comparative trials on the effectiveness of established therapeutic alternatives have not been performed, but some authors consider surgery (recurrence rate 14–33% in 5 years) and CO2 laser ablation (recurrence rate 0–33%) to be first-line therapies (7). Relapse and progress to invasive cancer can occur independently of the treatment provided.

If PIN lesions are left untreated, the risk of progression to invasive penile cancer is estimated to be 5–10% (22). Although unusual, development of lymph node metastasis has been reported after treatment of PIN with circumcision combined with 5-FU (23). Progress of PIN to invasive penile cancer has been reported after CO2 laser ablation (24) and after PDT combined with topical 5-FU (25).

HIV-infected individuals have a greater relative risk of developing PIN lesions (26). However, no patients in our study were tested because we had no clinical or anamnestic suspicion of HIV infection. The known association between PIN lesions and HPV infection (7) was confirmed in our study, as HPV DNA was detected in all 5 tissue samples obtained from PIN lesions. However, HPV DNA was not detected in those samples collected from skin areas completely cleared of PIN after treatment. This could indicate that PDT and other treatments may suppress or eliminate HPV infection, although the amount of cases is insufficient to draw any firm conclusions. All HPV types found were known mucosal high-risk HPV types (4, 27).

Lichen sclerosus was confirmed in 30% of our patients with PIN, which is a result comparable to the frequency of lichen sclerosus in patients with penile SCC (28–30). Smoking, which has also been described as a risk factor for invasive penile cancer (31), was very common among our patients (90%). Although further studies are necessary, smoking should be discouraged (32). Lack of neonatal circumcision, as noted in all patients in our study, is a known risk factor for PIN (33) and penile cancer (31).

Individual assessment of each patient with PIN is required to provide optimal management. The choice of therapy should be based on the size and distribution of the lesions, while taking into account the experience of the physician. All PIN lesions in our study were managed with non-mutilating treatment alternatives. The ideal therapeutic modality is yet to be established, but penis-sparing therapy should be the aim. This recommendation is supported by the fact that none of our patients developed invasive SCCs during follow-up. We conclude that PDT should be added to the list of therapeutic alternatives in the treatment of PIN.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Research Nurse Christina Halldin for her valuable help with our patients. We also gratefully acknowledge the laboratory assistance with HPV analysis performed by Kia Sjölin and Camilla Lagheden.

Conflicts of interest: None reported.

REFERENCES

1. Queyrat L. Erythroplasie du gland. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syph 1911; 22: 372–378.

2. Bowen JT. Precancerous dermatoses: a study of two cases of chronic atypical epithelial proliferation. J Cutan Dis 1912; 30: 241–255.

3. Lloyd KM. Multicentric pigmented Bowen’s disease of the groin. Arch Dermatol 1970; 101: 48–51.

4. Wade TR, Kopf AW, Ackerman AB. Bowenoid papulosis of the penis. Cancer 1978; 42: 1890–1903.

5. Yoneta A, Yamashita T, Jin HY, Iwasawa A, Kondo S, Jimbow K. Development of squamous cell carcinoma by two high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs), a novel HPV-67 and HPV-31 from bowenoid papulosis. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143: 604–608.

6. Kaye V, Zhang G, Dehner LP, Fraley EE. Carcinoma in situ of penis. Is distinction between erythroplasia of Queyrat and Bowen‘s disease relevant? Urology 1990; 36: 479–482.

7. von Krogh G, Horenblas S. The management and prevention of premalignant penile lesions. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000; 205 (Suppl.): 220–229.

8. Cardamakis E, Relakis K, Ginopoulos P, Korantzis A, Metalinos K, Stathopoulos E, et al. Treatment of penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) with interferon alpha-2a, CO2 laser (vaporization) and 5-fluorouracil 5% (5-FU). Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 1997; 18: 410–413.

9. Gerber GS.Carcinoma in situ of the penis. J Urol 1994; 151: 829–833.

10. Sonnex TS, Ralfs IG, Plaza de Lanza M, Dawber RP. Treatment of erythroplasia of Queyrat with liquid nitrogen cryosurgery. Br J Dermatol 1982; 106: 581–584.

11. Micali G, Nasca MR, Tedeschi A. Topical treatment of intraepithelial penile carcinoma with imiquimod. Clin Exp Dermatol 2003; 28(suppl.): 4–6.

12. Danielsen AG, Sand C, Weismann K. Treatment of Bowen’s disease of the penis with imiquimod 5% cream. Clin Exp Dermatol 2003; 28(suppl.): 7–9.

13. Petrow W, Gerdsen R, Uerlich M, Richter O, Bieber T. Successful topical immunotherapy of bowenoid papulosis with imiquimod. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145: 1022–1023.

14. Stables GI, Stringer MR, Robinson DJ, Ash DV. Erythroplasia of Queyrat treated by topical aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140: 514–517.

15. Yang CH, Lee JC, Chen CH, Hui CY, Hong HS, Kuo HW. Photodynamic therapy for bowenoid papulosis using a novel incoherent light-emitting diode device. Br J Dermatol 2003; 149: 1297–1299.

16. Koderhold G, Jindra R, Koren H, Alth G, Schenk G. Experiences of photodynamic therapy in dermatology. J Photochem Photobiol B 1996; 36: 221–223.

17. Harth Y, Hirshovitz B. Topical photodynamic therapy in basal and squamous cell carcinoma and penile Bowen’s disease with 20% aminolevulinic acid, and exposure to red light and infrared light. Harefuah 1998; 134: 602–605.

18. Lee MR, Ryman W. Erythroplasia of Queyrat treated with topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy. Australas J Dermatol. 2005; 46:196–198.

19. de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, van den Brule AJ, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ. The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3’ ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCR. J Gen Virol 1995; 76: 1057–1062.

20. Forslund O, Hansson BG, Bjerre B. Typing of human papillomaviruses by consensus polymerase chain reaction and a non-radioactive reverse dot blot hybridization. J Virol Methods 1994; 49: 129–139.

21. Forslund O, Antonsson A, Edlund K, van den Brule AJ, Hansson BJ, Meijer CJ, et al. Population-based type-specific prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in middle-aged Swedish women. J Med Virol 2002; 66: 535–541.

22. Markos AR. The management of penile intraepithelial neoplasia in genitourinary medicine. Int J STD AIDS 2003; 14: 314–319.

23. Eng TY, Petersen JP, Stack RS, Judson PH. Lymph node metastasis from carcinoma in situ of the penis: a case report. J Urol 1995; 153: 432–434.

24. Tsukamoto T, Yonese J, Kin T, Samejima T, Hasegawa Y, Fukui I, et al. Carcinoma in situ of the penis rapidly progressing after carbon dioxide laser treatment. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 2002; 93: 483–486.

25. Varma S, Holt PJ, Anstey AV. Erythroplasia of Queyrat treated by topical aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy: a cautionary tale. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142: 825–826.

26. Frisch M, Biggar RJ, Goedert JJ. Human papillomavirus-associated cancers in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1500–1510.

27. Favre M, Kremsdorf D, Jablonska S, Obalek S, Pehau-Arnaudet G, Croissant O, et al. Two new human papillomavirus types (HPV 54 and 55) characterized from genital tumours illustrate the plurality of genital HPVs. Int J Cancer 1990; 45: 40–46.

28. Powell J, Robson A, Cranston D, Wojnarowska F, Turner R. High incidence of lichen sclerosus in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Br J Dermatol 2001; 145: 85–89.

29. Perceau G, Derancourt C, Clavel C, Durlach A, Pluot M, Lardennois B, et al. Lichen sclerosus is frequently present in penile squamous cell carcinomas but is not always associated with oncogenic human papillomavirus. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148: 934–938.

30. Velazquez EF, Cubilla AL. Lichen sclerosus in 68 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: frequent atypias and correlation with special carcinoma variants suggests a precancerous role. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27: 1448–1453.

31. Maden C, Sherman KJ, Beckmann AM, Hislop TG, Teh CZ, Ashley RL, et al. History of circumcision, medical conditions, and sexual activity and risk of penile cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 19–24.

32. Porter WM, Francis N, Hawkins D, Dinneen M, Bunker CB. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia: clinical spectrum and treatment of 35 cases. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147: 1159–1165.

33. Schoen EJ, Oehrli M, Colby C, Machin G.The highly protective effect of newborn circumcision against invasive penile cancer. Pediatrics 2000; 105: E36.