Content » Vol 101, February

Clinical Report

Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Primary Versus Recurrent or Incompletely Excised Facial High-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas

Hannah Ceder, Malin Grönberg, John Paoli
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3698

Abstract

Facial high-risk basal cell carcinomas are preferably treated with Mohs micrographic surgery, but only 10% of patients are offered Mohs micrographic surgery in Sweden. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the differences between primary and recurrent or incompletely excised facial high-risk basal cell carcinomas undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery, with regard to the number of stages, final defect sizes, reconstructive techniques and other consequences. The study was performed during the period 2012 to 2019 at our centre. A total of 903 basal cell carcinomas in 813 patients (70.1% primary, 10.4% incompletely excised and 19.5% recurrences) were included. The mean number of Mohs micrographic surgery stages was significantly lower for primary basal cell carcinomas compared with recurrences (p = 0.03), and the mean final defect size was significantly smaller in primary basal cell carcinomas compared with both recurrent (p < 0.0001) and incompletely excised (p = 0.003) tumours. Primary basal cell carcinomas tended to more often be reconstructed by primary closure (p = 0.08). Mohs micrographic surgery indications for facial high-risk basal cell carcinomas should be respected and used more frequently on primary basal cell carcinomas, in order to enable better utilization of resources and improved outcomes for the patient.

Significance

In most European countries, Mohs micrographic surgery is underused and is often reserved for patients with facial high-risk basal cell carcinomas in which previous treatments have failed. This study shows that following international guidelines and using Mohs micrographic surgery as indicated when deciding on the primary management of high-risk facial basal cell carcinomas would probably increase the number of less complex procedures, i.e. fewer stages, smaller defects and a higher probability of primary closures.

Supplementary content

Comments

Not logged in! You need to login/create an account to comment on articles. Click here to login/create an account.