You are not logged in. Press here to login.

Content

List volumes - List articles in this issue

Original report

Validity and reliability of the de Morton Mobility Index in the subacute hospital setting in a geriatric evaluation and management population

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0626

Open access

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinimetric properties of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) in a Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) population.
DESIGN: A longitudinal validation study (n = 100) and inter-rater reliability study (n = 29) in a GEM population.
Patients: Consecutive patients admitted to a GEM rehabilitation ward were eligible for inclusion.
METHODS: At hospital admission and discharge, a physical therapist assessed patients with physical performance instruments that included the 6-metre walk test, step test, Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance, Timed Up and Go test, 6-minute walk test and the DEMMI. Consecutively eligible patients were included in an inter-rater reliability study between physical therapists.
RESULTS: DEMMI admission scores were normally distributed (mean 30.2, standard deviation 16.7) and other activity limitation instruments had either a floor or a ceiling effect. Evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity for the DEMMI were obtained. The minimal detectable change with 90% confidence was 10.5 (95% confidence interval 6.1–17.9) points and the minimally clinically important difference was 8.4 points on the 100-point interval DEMMI scale.
CONCLUSION: The DEMMI provides clinicians with an accurate and valid method of measuring mobility for geriatric patients in the subacute hospital setting.

Authors:

Natalie A. de Morton, Kylie Lane

References

  1. Kawamoto K, Houlihan C, Balas A, Lobach D. Information in practice. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330: 765.
  2. Keith R, Granger C, Hamilton B, Sherwin F. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In: Eisenberg MG, Grzesiak RC, editors. Advances in clinical rehabilitation. New York: Springer; 1987, p. 6–18.
  3. Granger C, Hamilton B, Keith R, Zielezny M, Sherwin F. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986; 1: 59–74.
  4. Hamilton B, Granger C, Sherwin F, Zielezny M, Tashman J. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer M, editor. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishers; 1987, p. 137–147.
  5. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. MD State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65.
  6. de Morton NA, Keating JL, Davidson M. Rasch analysis of the Barthel Index in the assessment of hospitalised older patients following admission for an acute medical condition. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 641– 647.
  7. Davenport S, Paynter S, de Morton NA. What instruments have been used to assess the mobility of community dwelling older adults? Phys Ther Rev 2008; 13: 345–354.
  8. de Morton NA, Berlowitz DJ, Keating JL. A systematic review of mobility instruments and their measurement properties for older acute medical patients. BMC Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 44.
  9. de Morton NA, Davidson M, Keating JL. The de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI): an essential index for an ageing world. BMC Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 63.
  10. Hodkinson H. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1972; 1: 233–238.
  11. Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Higgins J, Ahmed S, Finch LE, Richards CL. Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1204–1212.
  12. Shumway-Cook A, Horak F. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction on balance: suggestions from the field. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1548–1550.
  13. Hill KD, Bernhardt J, McGann AM, Maltese D, Berkovits D. A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: reliability, validity, and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiother Can 1996; 48: 257–262.
  14. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson P. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 1985; 132: 919–923.
  15. Cohen H, Blatchly C, Gombash L. A study of the Clinical Test of Sensory Interacion and Balance. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 346–351.
  16. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for the frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–148.
  17. King MB, Judge JO, Whipple R, Wolfsen L. Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of functional training intervention. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 8–16.
  18. SPSS for Windows. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; Rel 12.0.0 2003.
  19. Andrich D, Sheridan BS, Luo G. RUMM2020. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 2003.
  20. Tennant A, Pallant J. Unidimensionality matters! (A tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Meas Transact 2006; 20: 1048–1051.
  21. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes on health related quality of life. The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41: 582–5892.
  22. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27: S178–S189.
  23. Stratford PW, Finch E, Solomon P, Binkley J, Gill C, Moreland J. Using the Roland-Morris Questionnaire to make decisions about individual patients. Physiother Can 1996; 48: 107–110.
  24. Brusco N, Shields N, Taylor N, Paratz J. A Saturday physiotherapy service may decrease length of stay in patients undergoing rehabilitation in hospital: a randomised controlled trial. Austral J Physiother 2007; 53: 75–81.


Related articles

There are no related articles.


Actions


Abstract

Full text

PDF

Supplementary


There is no supplementary for this article.

Related articles


Click here to show related articles

Print information


Volume 42, Issue 10

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0626

Pages: 956-961

View at PubMed