You are not logged in. Press here to login.

Content

List volumes - List articles in this issue

Original report

A prospective study on coping strategies and quality of life in patients after stroke, assessing prognostic relationships and estimates of cost-effectiveness

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0313

Open access

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prognostic value of coping strategies of patients after stroke at time of discharge on quality of life approximately one year later. In addition, we estimated the maximum cost of improving quality of life by enhancing coping strategies using strict assumptions.
METHODS: Eighty patients with a stroke completed several questionnaires, at discharge to home and 9–12 months later (follow-up). Questionnaires measured quality of life, coping strategies Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment. First, a regression analysis was carried out predicting quality of life at follow-up from coping strategies at discharge. Secondly, a maximum in terms of acceptable cost was calculated for several possible effect sizes.
RESULTS: Both coping strategies at discharge were positively associated with quality of life at follow-up. With regards to cost-effectiveness, a medium effect size would result in an increase in quality of life of approximately 10%. The maximum acceptable cost of an intervention for a single patient is therefore set at €2500, assuming a benefit of one year and a cost per quality adjusted life year of €25,000.
CONCLUSION: Coping strategies at discharge are predictive of quality of life one year later. The costs of improving quality of life are thought to be within the limits that determine a cost-effective intervention.

Authors:

Anne-Sophie E. Darlington, Diederik W.J. Dippel, Gerard M. Ribbers, Romke van Balen, Jan Passchier, Jan J.V. Busschbach



Related articles

There are no related articles.


Actions


Abstract

PDF

Supplementary


There is no supplementary for this article.

Related articles


Click here to show related articles

Print information


Volume 41, Issue 4

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0313

Pages: 237-241

View at PubMed